The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect

Subimal Chatterjee, Rajat Roy, Ashwin Malshe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We show that adding entrant brands to a choice set compr ising of a predominantly promotion brand and a predominantly prevention brand can make both promotion and prevention-oriented consumers susceptible to the attraction effect. If an entrant targets the brand possessing superior promotion (prevention) feature, the resulting dominance relationship allows the promotion (prevention) focused consumers to sustain their regulatory focus. Entrant brands (and the associated dominance heuristic) therefore contribute to decision value by allowing both promotion and prevention-focused consumers pursue their goal in a way that fits with their regulatory concerns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-481
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Regulatory fit
Attraction effect
Heuristics
Regulatory focus
Choice sets

Cite this

Chatterjee, Subimal ; Roy, Rajat ; Malshe, Ashwin. / The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect. In: Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 473-481.
@article{7d81201ff5c443169000aaffd130f3ae,
title = "The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect",
abstract = "We show that adding entrant brands to a choice set compr ising of a predominantly promotion brand and a predominantly prevention brand can make both promotion and prevention-oriented consumers susceptible to the attraction effect. If an entrant targets the brand possessing superior promotion (prevention) feature, the resulting dominance relationship allows the promotion (prevention) focused consumers to sustain their regulatory focus. Entrant brands (and the associated dominance heuristic) therefore contribute to decision value by allowing both promotion and prevention-focused consumers pursue their goal in a way that fits with their regulatory concerns.",
author = "Subimal Chatterjee and Rajat Roy and Ashwin Malshe",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2010.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "473--481",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect. / Chatterjee, Subimal; Roy, Rajat; Malshe, Ashwin.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, p. 473-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect

AU - Chatterjee, Subimal

AU - Roy, Rajat

AU - Malshe, Ashwin

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We show that adding entrant brands to a choice set compr ising of a predominantly promotion brand and a predominantly prevention brand can make both promotion and prevention-oriented consumers susceptible to the attraction effect. If an entrant targets the brand possessing superior promotion (prevention) feature, the resulting dominance relationship allows the promotion (prevention) focused consumers to sustain their regulatory focus. Entrant brands (and the associated dominance heuristic) therefore contribute to decision value by allowing both promotion and prevention-focused consumers pursue their goal in a way that fits with their regulatory concerns.

AB - We show that adding entrant brands to a choice set compr ising of a predominantly promotion brand and a predominantly prevention brand can make both promotion and prevention-oriented consumers susceptible to the attraction effect. If an entrant targets the brand possessing superior promotion (prevention) feature, the resulting dominance relationship allows the promotion (prevention) focused consumers to sustain their regulatory focus. Entrant brands (and the associated dominance heuristic) therefore contribute to decision value by allowing both promotion and prevention-focused consumers pursue their goal in a way that fits with their regulatory concerns.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 473

EP - 481

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 4

ER -