The rise of cholesterol testing: How much is unnecessary?

Helen Doll, Brian Shine, Jonathan Kay, Tim James, Paul Glasziou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laboratory testing has increased dramatically over recent decades, which is a consequence particularly of repeat testing or monitoring, as either a response to treatment or follow-up. Aim: To assess rates of measurement of lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride) for diagnosis and monitoring over the last 20 years. Design of study: Audit of electronic database. Setting: A single region in the UK (Oxfordshire). Method: Specimens from individual patients were matched over time. All tests that were the third or more in a 3-year period were considered to be for monitoring, while the first and second were considered to be for diagnosis. As recent evidence-based recommendations suggest that frequent monitoring of cholesterol may reflect measurement error rather than true changes, between one and three tests in each 3-year period were considered to be 'necessary'. Results: Over the 20 years from 1987 there has been a more than 15-fold rise in the overall number of lipid tests requested. After a small decline in the early 1990s, testing rose steadily after publication of several large statin trials, particularly tests requested in primary rather than secondary care. Repeat testing (likely to be for monitoring) rose from 24% of tests (1993-1995) to 61% (2005-2007), with between 42% and 79% of tests in 2005-2007 possibly being unnecessary. Mean cholesterol values declined over time from 1996 onwards. Conclusion: In the last decade, the number of cholesterol tests performed in Oxfordshire has risen dramatically. Much of this appears to be for monitoring purposes rather than case finding or risk assessment. The majority of cholesterol tests requested may be unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume61
Issue number583
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cholesterol
Lipids
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Secondary Care
Hypercholesterolemia
Publications
Databases
Therapeutics

Cite this

Doll, Helen ; Shine, Brian ; Kay, Jonathan ; James, Tim ; Glasziou, Paul. / The rise of cholesterol testing : How much is unnecessary?. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2011 ; Vol. 61, No. 583.
@article{80b71fa4b7b34594a1c6742c543eafb2,
title = "The rise of cholesterol testing: How much is unnecessary?",
abstract = "Background: Laboratory testing has increased dramatically over recent decades, which is a consequence particularly of repeat testing or monitoring, as either a response to treatment or follow-up. Aim: To assess rates of measurement of lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride) for diagnosis and monitoring over the last 20 years. Design of study: Audit of electronic database. Setting: A single region in the UK (Oxfordshire). Method: Specimens from individual patients were matched over time. All tests that were the third or more in a 3-year period were considered to be for monitoring, while the first and second were considered to be for diagnosis. As recent evidence-based recommendations suggest that frequent monitoring of cholesterol may reflect measurement error rather than true changes, between one and three tests in each 3-year period were considered to be 'necessary'. Results: Over the 20 years from 1987 there has been a more than 15-fold rise in the overall number of lipid tests requested. After a small decline in the early 1990s, testing rose steadily after publication of several large statin trials, particularly tests requested in primary rather than secondary care. Repeat testing (likely to be for monitoring) rose from 24{\%} of tests (1993-1995) to 61{\%} (2005-2007), with between 42{\%} and 79{\%} of tests in 2005-2007 possibly being unnecessary. Mean cholesterol values declined over time from 1996 onwards. Conclusion: In the last decade, the number of cholesterol tests performed in Oxfordshire has risen dramatically. Much of this appears to be for monitoring purposes rather than case finding or risk assessment. The majority of cholesterol tests requested may be unnecessary.",
author = "Helen Doll and Brian Shine and Jonathan Kay and Tim James and Paul Glasziou",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp11X556245",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS",
number = "583",

}

The rise of cholesterol testing : How much is unnecessary? / Doll, Helen; Shine, Brian; Kay, Jonathan; James, Tim; Glasziou, Paul.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 61, No. 583, 02.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise of cholesterol testing

T2 - How much is unnecessary?

AU - Doll, Helen

AU - Shine, Brian

AU - Kay, Jonathan

AU - James, Tim

AU - Glasziou, Paul

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Background: Laboratory testing has increased dramatically over recent decades, which is a consequence particularly of repeat testing or monitoring, as either a response to treatment or follow-up. Aim: To assess rates of measurement of lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride) for diagnosis and monitoring over the last 20 years. Design of study: Audit of electronic database. Setting: A single region in the UK (Oxfordshire). Method: Specimens from individual patients were matched over time. All tests that were the third or more in a 3-year period were considered to be for monitoring, while the first and second were considered to be for diagnosis. As recent evidence-based recommendations suggest that frequent monitoring of cholesterol may reflect measurement error rather than true changes, between one and three tests in each 3-year period were considered to be 'necessary'. Results: Over the 20 years from 1987 there has been a more than 15-fold rise in the overall number of lipid tests requested. After a small decline in the early 1990s, testing rose steadily after publication of several large statin trials, particularly tests requested in primary rather than secondary care. Repeat testing (likely to be for monitoring) rose from 24% of tests (1993-1995) to 61% (2005-2007), with between 42% and 79% of tests in 2005-2007 possibly being unnecessary. Mean cholesterol values declined over time from 1996 onwards. Conclusion: In the last decade, the number of cholesterol tests performed in Oxfordshire has risen dramatically. Much of this appears to be for monitoring purposes rather than case finding or risk assessment. The majority of cholesterol tests requested may be unnecessary.

AB - Background: Laboratory testing has increased dramatically over recent decades, which is a consequence particularly of repeat testing or monitoring, as either a response to treatment or follow-up. Aim: To assess rates of measurement of lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride) for diagnosis and monitoring over the last 20 years. Design of study: Audit of electronic database. Setting: A single region in the UK (Oxfordshire). Method: Specimens from individual patients were matched over time. All tests that were the third or more in a 3-year period were considered to be for monitoring, while the first and second were considered to be for diagnosis. As recent evidence-based recommendations suggest that frequent monitoring of cholesterol may reflect measurement error rather than true changes, between one and three tests in each 3-year period were considered to be 'necessary'. Results: Over the 20 years from 1987 there has been a more than 15-fold rise in the overall number of lipid tests requested. After a small decline in the early 1990s, testing rose steadily after publication of several large statin trials, particularly tests requested in primary rather than secondary care. Repeat testing (likely to be for monitoring) rose from 24% of tests (1993-1995) to 61% (2005-2007), with between 42% and 79% of tests in 2005-2007 possibly being unnecessary. Mean cholesterol values declined over time from 1996 onwards. Conclusion: In the last decade, the number of cholesterol tests performed in Oxfordshire has risen dramatically. Much of this appears to be for monitoring purposes rather than case finding or risk assessment. The majority of cholesterol tests requested may be unnecessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957440984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp11X556245

DO - 10.3399/bjgp11X556245

M3 - Article

VL - 61

JO - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

JF - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 583

ER -