The rights of the wrongly convicted

RA Lincoln, Carol Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Interest and recognition of miscarriages of justice has been increasing in Australia and indeed around the world, generated by high profile cases, the emergence of Innocence Projects, as well as tribunals such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission in the United Kingdom. Despite this, there is often a desire to marginalise miscarriages of justice, evidenced by narrow definitions that are limited to situations where the review mechanisms in place have failed to correct the wrong that has occurred. In contrast, a broader definition describes a miscarriage as a failure to achieve justice. Indeed this failure 'can occur at any stage of the criminal justice process, from law-making through street policing practices, investigations, court processes and custodial practices'. As a result, miscarriages of justice raise 'concerns regarding the fallibility of due process, human rights violations, and the limitation of the adversarial approach'. These concerns have led to a critical and questioning attitude toward the justice system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-7
Number of pages6
JournalNational Legal Eagle
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

justice
human rights violation
Law

Cite this

Lincoln, RA ; Morrison, Carol. / The rights of the wrongly convicted. In: National Legal Eagle. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 2-7.
@article{259c5f458b374b3796b1a7a24c949907,
title = "The rights of the wrongly convicted",
abstract = "Interest and recognition of miscarriages of justice has been increasing in Australia and indeed around the world, generated by high profile cases, the emergence of Innocence Projects, as well as tribunals such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission in the United Kingdom. Despite this, there is often a desire to marginalise miscarriages of justice, evidenced by narrow definitions that are limited to situations where the review mechanisms in place have failed to correct the wrong that has occurred. In contrast, a broader definition describes a miscarriage as a failure to achieve justice. Indeed this failure 'can occur at any stage of the criminal justice process, from law-making through street policing practices, investigations, court processes and custodial practices'. As a result, miscarriages of justice raise 'concerns regarding the fallibility of due process, human rights violations, and the limitation of the adversarial approach'. These concerns have led to a critical and questioning attitude toward the justice system.",
author = "RA Lincoln and Carol Morrison",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "2--7",
journal = "National Legal Eagle",
issn = "0813-9741",
number = "2",

}

Lincoln, RA & Morrison, C 2006, 'The rights of the wrongly convicted' National Legal Eagle, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2-7.

The rights of the wrongly convicted. / Lincoln, RA; Morrison, Carol.

In: National Legal Eagle, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2006, p. 2-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rights of the wrongly convicted

AU - Lincoln, RA

AU - Morrison, Carol

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Interest and recognition of miscarriages of justice has been increasing in Australia and indeed around the world, generated by high profile cases, the emergence of Innocence Projects, as well as tribunals such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission in the United Kingdom. Despite this, there is often a desire to marginalise miscarriages of justice, evidenced by narrow definitions that are limited to situations where the review mechanisms in place have failed to correct the wrong that has occurred. In contrast, a broader definition describes a miscarriage as a failure to achieve justice. Indeed this failure 'can occur at any stage of the criminal justice process, from law-making through street policing practices, investigations, court processes and custodial practices'. As a result, miscarriages of justice raise 'concerns regarding the fallibility of due process, human rights violations, and the limitation of the adversarial approach'. These concerns have led to a critical and questioning attitude toward the justice system.

AB - Interest and recognition of miscarriages of justice has been increasing in Australia and indeed around the world, generated by high profile cases, the emergence of Innocence Projects, as well as tribunals such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission in the United Kingdom. Despite this, there is often a desire to marginalise miscarriages of justice, evidenced by narrow definitions that are limited to situations where the review mechanisms in place have failed to correct the wrong that has occurred. In contrast, a broader definition describes a miscarriage as a failure to achieve justice. Indeed this failure 'can occur at any stage of the criminal justice process, from law-making through street policing practices, investigations, court processes and custodial practices'. As a result, miscarriages of justice raise 'concerns regarding the fallibility of due process, human rights violations, and the limitation of the adversarial approach'. These concerns have led to a critical and questioning attitude toward the justice system.

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 2

EP - 7

JO - National Legal Eagle

JF - National Legal Eagle

SN - 0813-9741

IS - 2

ER -