The Right to Confrontation in Common Law Systems: A Critical Comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


Recent years have seen a departure from traditional criminal due process requirements in the wake of 9/11, one feature of which has been the increased use of closed court hearings in relation to the introduction of evidence considered particularly sensitive to national security. Typically, both the person affected by the proceedings and their legal adviser are excluded from such a hearing. These developments contradict long-established and fundamental characteristics of proceedings in a criminal law trial in common law systems, such as the open court principle and the adversarial nature of proceedings. They also contradict the right to confront accusers, a right traceable to Roman times, and a feature of the British system for more than four centuries, and of the American system for more than two. This article highlights the latest case law developments in key jurisdictions around the world before critically appraising trends evident in the recent jurisprudence. It is critical of the fact that courts in some jurisdictions have permitted substantial departures from the right of an individual to confront witnesses being used against them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-165
Number of pages37
JournalNew Criminal Law Review
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'The Right to Confrontation in Common Law Systems: A Critical Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this