The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval

Tony Badrick, Robert C. Hawkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Methods and results: The reporting interval R is the smallest unit of measurement chosen for clinical reporting. When choosing the appropriate value for R, it is necessary that the reference change values and expanded MU values can be meaningfully calculated. Expanded MU provides the tighter criterion for defining an upper limit for R. This limit can be determined as R≤k.SDa/1.9, where SDa is the analytical standard deviation and k is the coverage factor (usually 2).

Conclusion: Using MU estimates to determine the reporting interval for quantitative laboratory results ensures that reporting practices match local analytical performance and recognizes the inherent error of the measurement process.

Background: Measurement uncertainty (MU) estimates can be used by clinicians in result interpretation for diagnosis and monitoring and by laboratories in assessing assay fitness for use and analytical troubleshooting. However, MU is not routinely used to assess the appropriateness of the analyte reporting interval.We describe the relationship between MU and the analyte reporting interval.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-179
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Units of measurement
Reference Values
Assays
Monitoring

Cite this

Badrick, Tony ; Hawkins, Robert C. / The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval. In: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2015 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 177-179.
@article{e15bd636339b48cab845ef8010a616de,
title = "The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval",
abstract = "Methods and results: The reporting interval R is the smallest unit of measurement chosen for clinical reporting. When choosing the appropriate value for R, it is necessary that the reference change values and expanded MU values can be meaningfully calculated. Expanded MU provides the tighter criterion for defining an upper limit for R. This limit can be determined as R≤k.SDa/1.9, where SDa is the analytical standard deviation and k is the coverage factor (usually 2).Conclusion: Using MU estimates to determine the reporting interval for quantitative laboratory results ensures that reporting practices match local analytical performance and recognizes the inherent error of the measurement process.Background: Measurement uncertainty (MU) estimates can be used by clinicians in result interpretation for diagnosis and monitoring and by laboratories in assessing assay fitness for use and analytical troubleshooting. However, MU is not routinely used to assess the appropriateness of the analyte reporting interval.We describe the relationship between MU and the analyte reporting interval.",
author = "Tony Badrick and Hawkins, {Robert C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/0004563214531558",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "177--179",
journal = "Annals of Clinical Biochemistry",
issn = "0004-5632",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval. / Badrick, Tony; Hawkins, Robert C.

In: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, Vol. 52, No. 1, 19.01.2015, p. 177-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval

AU - Badrick, Tony

AU - Hawkins, Robert C.

PY - 2015/1/19

Y1 - 2015/1/19

N2 - Methods and results: The reporting interval R is the smallest unit of measurement chosen for clinical reporting. When choosing the appropriate value for R, it is necessary that the reference change values and expanded MU values can be meaningfully calculated. Expanded MU provides the tighter criterion for defining an upper limit for R. This limit can be determined as R≤k.SDa/1.9, where SDa is the analytical standard deviation and k is the coverage factor (usually 2).Conclusion: Using MU estimates to determine the reporting interval for quantitative laboratory results ensures that reporting practices match local analytical performance and recognizes the inherent error of the measurement process.Background: Measurement uncertainty (MU) estimates can be used by clinicians in result interpretation for diagnosis and monitoring and by laboratories in assessing assay fitness for use and analytical troubleshooting. However, MU is not routinely used to assess the appropriateness of the analyte reporting interval.We describe the relationship between MU and the analyte reporting interval.

AB - Methods and results: The reporting interval R is the smallest unit of measurement chosen for clinical reporting. When choosing the appropriate value for R, it is necessary that the reference change values and expanded MU values can be meaningfully calculated. Expanded MU provides the tighter criterion for defining an upper limit for R. This limit can be determined as R≤k.SDa/1.9, where SDa is the analytical standard deviation and k is the coverage factor (usually 2).Conclusion: Using MU estimates to determine the reporting interval for quantitative laboratory results ensures that reporting practices match local analytical performance and recognizes the inherent error of the measurement process.Background: Measurement uncertainty (MU) estimates can be used by clinicians in result interpretation for diagnosis and monitoring and by laboratories in assessing assay fitness for use and analytical troubleshooting. However, MU is not routinely used to assess the appropriateness of the analyte reporting interval.We describe the relationship between MU and the analyte reporting interval.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918803646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0004563214531558

DO - 10.1177/0004563214531558

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 177

EP - 179

JO - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

JF - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

SN - 0004-5632

IS - 1

ER -