The relationship between assessed risk and service security level for offenders with intellectual disability

William Lindsay*, Derek Carson, Gregory O'Brien, Anthony J. Holland, Susan Johnston, John L. Taylor, Steven Young, Lesley Steptoe, Jessica Ruth Wheeler, Claire Middleton, Karen Price

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following social policies of deinstitutionalisation, few offenders with intellectual disability(ID) are diverted into local hospitals and they are now referred to a range of community and secure services. Of 197 participants, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide was completed on 181 and the Static-99 on 83. Assessed risk was then related to six levels of service: community generic, specialist community forensic ID, learning disability in patient, low secure, medium secure and high secure. On both assessments, those in high secure had a significantly greater average assessed risk than in the community. Correlations between assessed risk and level of service showed low to medium effect sizes. Despite an orderly relationship between assessed risk and level of security, the effect sizes are not large suggesting that factors may intervene to place some individuals of a high risk in community settings and others of a low risk in secure settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-548
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between assessed risk and service security level for offenders with intellectual disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lindsay, W., Carson, D., O'Brien, G., Holland, A. J., Johnston, S., Taylor, J. L., Young, S., Steptoe, L., Wheeler, J. R., Middleton, C., & Price, K. (2010). The relationship between assessed risk and service security level for offenders with intellectual disability. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 21(4), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789941003653212