TY - JOUR
T1 - The relation between R&D intensity and future market returns: Does expensing versus capitalization matter?
AU - Chan, Howard W.H.
AU - Faff, Robert W.
AU - Gharghori, Philip
AU - Ho, Yew Kee
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - The Australian accounting environment provides an ideal setting for examining the impact of different accounting treatments of firms' R&D activities on their subsequent returns. Unlike US firms, which can only expense R&D, Australian GAAP permits firms to either expense or capitalize their R&D expenditure. We examine separately the market impact of the R&D intensity of all R&D active firms, 'capitalizers' and 'expensers'. Our results suggest that firms with higher R&D intensity perform better, regardless of the accounting method used, consistent with the resource-based view of the firm. We also find some evidence that firms which expense R&D outperform those which capitalize R&D after controlling for R&D intensity.
AB - The Australian accounting environment provides an ideal setting for examining the impact of different accounting treatments of firms' R&D activities on their subsequent returns. Unlike US firms, which can only expense R&D, Australian GAAP permits firms to either expense or capitalize their R&D expenditure. We examine separately the market impact of the R&D intensity of all R&D active firms, 'capitalizers' and 'expensers'. Our results suggest that firms with higher R&D intensity perform better, regardless of the accounting method used, consistent with the resource-based view of the firm. We also find some evidence that firms which expense R&D outperform those which capitalize R&D after controlling for R&D intensity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548207656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11156-007-0023-1
DO - 10.1007/s11156-007-0023-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34548207656
SN - 0924-865X
VL - 29
SP - 25
EP - 51
JO - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
JF - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
IS - 1
ER -