Abstract
Several State jurisdictions in Australia have implemented legislation that detains a sex offender in prison after the conclusion of their prison sentence on the basis of a prediction of risk and with no further requirement of a fresh crime or criminal trial. A constitutional challenge to this legislation failed (see (2004) 11(2) PP L 244-253). This article sets out arguments that have been advanced by Ken Tillman in a communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee that the New South Wales legislation inflicts arbitrary detention and double punishment contrary to Articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 262-270 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The "preventive detention" of serious sex offenders: Further consideration of the international human rights dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver