The prevalence and practice impact of weight bias amongst Australian dietitians

Tara Diversi, Roger Hughes, K. J. Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives
This study explored weight bias amongst Australian Accredited Practising Dietitians (APDs) and the effect of client weight status on dietetic practice.

Methods
Participants were 201 APDs, recruited using purposive sampling. A self-administered questionnaire, the fat phobia scale (FPS), was completed to assess explicit weight bias. Participants were then randomized to receive either a female within the healthy weight range or female with obesity, accompanied by an identical case study for a condition unrelated to weight. Participants assessed the client based on data provided, provided recommendations and rated their perception of the client.

Results
Mean FPS scores indicated mild fat phobia. However, dietetic practice was significantly affected by the client's weight status. Dietitians presented with the female with obesity assessed the client to have significantly lower health and were more likely to provide unsolicited weight management recommendations. In addition, dietitians rated the client as less receptive, less motivated and as having a lower ability to understand and sustain recommendations.

Conclusions
The contribution of this study is the exploration of how weight status may impact dietetic practice including assessment, recommendations and perceptions of the client. Dietitians may practice in a manner that represents or could be perceived as negative implicit weight bias, despite the explicit FPS assessing only mild fat phobia. Further research to understand the extent of the problem and how it impacts client outcomes and to test possible solutions is required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-465
Number of pages10
JournalObesity Science & Practice
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Nutritionists
Weights and Measures
Phobic Disorders
Fats
Dietetics
Obesity
Aptitude
Health

Cite this

Diversi, Tara ; Hughes, Roger ; Burke, K. J. / The prevalence and practice impact of weight bias amongst Australian dietitians. In: Obesity Science & Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 2. pp. 456-465.
@article{d592c77826654bde802fe1d94a4259e4,
title = "The prevalence and practice impact of weight bias amongst Australian dietitians",
abstract = "ObjectivesThis study explored weight bias amongst Australian Accredited Practising Dietitians (APDs) and the effect of client weight status on dietetic practice.MethodsParticipants were 201 APDs, recruited using purposive sampling. A self-administered questionnaire, the fat phobia scale (FPS), was completed to assess explicit weight bias. Participants were then randomized to receive either a female within the healthy weight range or female with obesity, accompanied by an identical case study for a condition unrelated to weight. Participants assessed the client based on data provided, provided recommendations and rated their perception of the client.ResultsMean FPS scores indicated mild fat phobia. However, dietetic practice was significantly affected by the client's weight status. Dietitians presented with the female with obesity assessed the client to have significantly lower health and were more likely to provide unsolicited weight management recommendations. In addition, dietitians rated the client as less receptive, less motivated and as having a lower ability to understand and sustain recommendations.ConclusionsThe contribution of this study is the exploration of how weight status may impact dietetic practice including assessment, recommendations and perceptions of the client. Dietitians may practice in a manner that represents or could be perceived as negative implicit weight bias, despite the explicit FPS assessing only mild fat phobia. Further research to understand the extent of the problem and how it impacts client outcomes and to test possible solutions is required.",
author = "Tara Diversi and Roger Hughes and Burke, {K. J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1002/osp4.83",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "456--465",
journal = "Obesity Science & Practice",
issn = "2055-2238",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell (American Society Bone & Mineral Research)",

}

The prevalence and practice impact of weight bias amongst Australian dietitians. / Diversi, Tara; Hughes, Roger; Burke, K. J.

In: Obesity Science & Practice, Vol. 2, 17.11.2016, p. 456-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prevalence and practice impact of weight bias amongst Australian dietitians

AU - Diversi, Tara

AU - Hughes, Roger

AU - Burke, K. J.

PY - 2016/11/17

Y1 - 2016/11/17

N2 - ObjectivesThis study explored weight bias amongst Australian Accredited Practising Dietitians (APDs) and the effect of client weight status on dietetic practice.MethodsParticipants were 201 APDs, recruited using purposive sampling. A self-administered questionnaire, the fat phobia scale (FPS), was completed to assess explicit weight bias. Participants were then randomized to receive either a female within the healthy weight range or female with obesity, accompanied by an identical case study for a condition unrelated to weight. Participants assessed the client based on data provided, provided recommendations and rated their perception of the client.ResultsMean FPS scores indicated mild fat phobia. However, dietetic practice was significantly affected by the client's weight status. Dietitians presented with the female with obesity assessed the client to have significantly lower health and were more likely to provide unsolicited weight management recommendations. In addition, dietitians rated the client as less receptive, less motivated and as having a lower ability to understand and sustain recommendations.ConclusionsThe contribution of this study is the exploration of how weight status may impact dietetic practice including assessment, recommendations and perceptions of the client. Dietitians may practice in a manner that represents or could be perceived as negative implicit weight bias, despite the explicit FPS assessing only mild fat phobia. Further research to understand the extent of the problem and how it impacts client outcomes and to test possible solutions is required.

AB - ObjectivesThis study explored weight bias amongst Australian Accredited Practising Dietitians (APDs) and the effect of client weight status on dietetic practice.MethodsParticipants were 201 APDs, recruited using purposive sampling. A self-administered questionnaire, the fat phobia scale (FPS), was completed to assess explicit weight bias. Participants were then randomized to receive either a female within the healthy weight range or female with obesity, accompanied by an identical case study for a condition unrelated to weight. Participants assessed the client based on data provided, provided recommendations and rated their perception of the client.ResultsMean FPS scores indicated mild fat phobia. However, dietetic practice was significantly affected by the client's weight status. Dietitians presented with the female with obesity assessed the client to have significantly lower health and were more likely to provide unsolicited weight management recommendations. In addition, dietitians rated the client as less receptive, less motivated and as having a lower ability to understand and sustain recommendations.ConclusionsThe contribution of this study is the exploration of how weight status may impact dietetic practice including assessment, recommendations and perceptions of the client. Dietitians may practice in a manner that represents or could be perceived as negative implicit weight bias, despite the explicit FPS assessing only mild fat phobia. Further research to understand the extent of the problem and how it impacts client outcomes and to test possible solutions is required.

U2 - 10.1002/osp4.83

DO - 10.1002/osp4.83

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 456

EP - 465

JO - Obesity Science & Practice

JF - Obesity Science & Practice

SN - 2055-2238

ER -