The match between common antibiotics packaging and guidelines for their use in Australia

Treasure M. McGuire, Jane Smith, Chris Del Mar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the potential for a source of surplus antibiotics in the community to come from the mismatch between the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment for common indications in primary care and that dictated by default pharmaceutical industry packaging.

Methods: Analysis of existing published information of: 1) the most common antibiotics prescribed in primary care in Australia; 2) their most common indications; 3) the guideline recommendations for their duration; and 4) the duration dictated by antibiotic packaging.

Results: Of 32 common antibiotic prescribing scenarios, 10 had doses left over in surplus and 18 had a shortfall, leaving only four in which the packaging size matched the duration recommended by electronic Therapeutic Guidelines. Where there was a shortfall, this was only exactly accommodated by a repeat prescription in two cases.

Conclusions: Mismatch contributes to a shortfall or excess of doses compared to recommended antibiotic treatment protocols and probably exaggerates redundant doses in the community from prescribed antibiotics dispensed and not consumed.

Implications: Prescribers need to be aware that the mismatch between antibiotic pack sizes and guideline recommendations for their duration is contributing to antibiotic resistance in the community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-572
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Cite this

@article{1ed7d2181c994b8bbe69da06d339786c,
title = "The match between common antibiotics packaging and guidelines for their use in Australia",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the potential for a source of surplus antibiotics in the community to come from the mismatch between the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment for common indications in primary care and that dictated by default pharmaceutical industry packaging.Methods: Analysis of existing published information of: 1) the most common antibiotics prescribed in primary care in Australia; 2) their most common indications; 3) the guideline recommendations for their duration; and 4) the duration dictated by antibiotic packaging.Results: Of 32 common antibiotic prescribing scenarios, 10 had doses left over in surplus and 18 had a shortfall, leaving only four in which the packaging size matched the duration recommended by electronic Therapeutic Guidelines. Where there was a shortfall, this was only exactly accommodated by a repeat prescription in two cases.Conclusions: Mismatch contributes to a shortfall or excess of doses compared to recommended antibiotic treatment protocols and probably exaggerates redundant doses in the community from prescribed antibiotics dispensed and not consumed.Implications: Prescribers need to be aware that the mismatch between antibiotic pack sizes and guideline recommendations for their duration is contributing to antibiotic resistance in the community.",
author = "McGuire, {Treasure M.} and Jane Smith and {Del Mar}, Chris",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12385",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "569--572",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

The match between common antibiotics packaging and guidelines for their use in Australia. / McGuire, Treasure M.; Smith, Jane; Del Mar, Chris.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 39, No. 6, 12.2015, p. 569-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The match between common antibiotics packaging and guidelines for their use in Australia

AU - McGuire, Treasure M.

AU - Smith, Jane

AU - Del Mar, Chris

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Objectives: To determine the potential for a source of surplus antibiotics in the community to come from the mismatch between the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment for common indications in primary care and that dictated by default pharmaceutical industry packaging.Methods: Analysis of existing published information of: 1) the most common antibiotics prescribed in primary care in Australia; 2) their most common indications; 3) the guideline recommendations for their duration; and 4) the duration dictated by antibiotic packaging.Results: Of 32 common antibiotic prescribing scenarios, 10 had doses left over in surplus and 18 had a shortfall, leaving only four in which the packaging size matched the duration recommended by electronic Therapeutic Guidelines. Where there was a shortfall, this was only exactly accommodated by a repeat prescription in two cases.Conclusions: Mismatch contributes to a shortfall or excess of doses compared to recommended antibiotic treatment protocols and probably exaggerates redundant doses in the community from prescribed antibiotics dispensed and not consumed.Implications: Prescribers need to be aware that the mismatch between antibiotic pack sizes and guideline recommendations for their duration is contributing to antibiotic resistance in the community.

AB - Objectives: To determine the potential for a source of surplus antibiotics in the community to come from the mismatch between the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment for common indications in primary care and that dictated by default pharmaceutical industry packaging.Methods: Analysis of existing published information of: 1) the most common antibiotics prescribed in primary care in Australia; 2) their most common indications; 3) the guideline recommendations for their duration; and 4) the duration dictated by antibiotic packaging.Results: Of 32 common antibiotic prescribing scenarios, 10 had doses left over in surplus and 18 had a shortfall, leaving only four in which the packaging size matched the duration recommended by electronic Therapeutic Guidelines. Where there was a shortfall, this was only exactly accommodated by a repeat prescription in two cases.Conclusions: Mismatch contributes to a shortfall or excess of doses compared to recommended antibiotic treatment protocols and probably exaggerates redundant doses in the community from prescribed antibiotics dispensed and not consumed.Implications: Prescribers need to be aware that the mismatch between antibiotic pack sizes and guideline recommendations for their duration is contributing to antibiotic resistance in the community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954504059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12385

DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12385

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 569

EP - 572

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1326-0200

IS - 6

ER -