Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-74 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Legal Education Review |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
The marginalisation of racial discourses in Australian legal education. / James, Nickolas.
In: Legal Education Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2006, p. 55-74.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The marginalisation of racial discourses in Australian legal education
AU - James, Nickolas
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Radical legal education discourses are constructed as oppositional to orthodox legal education discourses such as doctrinalism and vocationalism, and emphasize the inadequacies of orthodox portrayals of law. Why are these radical discourses so often marginalized within the law school? In this paper I describe how this marginalization is a consequence of a range of external contingencies and the internal features of radical discourses, and suggest that marginalization is, perhaps, inevitable.
AB - Radical legal education discourses are constructed as oppositional to orthodox legal education discourses such as doctrinalism and vocationalism, and emphasize the inadequacies of orthodox portrayals of law. Why are these radical discourses so often marginalized within the law school? In this paper I describe how this marginalization is a consequence of a range of external contingencies and the internal features of radical discourses, and suggest that marginalization is, perhaps, inevitable.
M3 - Article
VL - 16
SP - 55
EP - 74
JO - Legal Education Review
JF - Legal Education Review
SN - 1033-2839
IS - 1
ER -