The Manuka honey fight is one we have to have

Research output: Contribution to journalOnline ResourceResearch


[Extract] The current row about the certification of Manuka honey, and whether it is a distinctly New Zealand product, is just the latest dispute involving Geographical Indications (GIs). These are markers that products have special qualities due to their origins in a specific region, like Champagne.

There is a debate as to whether a registered GI system for food should be adopted in Australia. It might be good for our farmers – to more effectively protect King Island Beef, Bangalow pork or Tasmanian lobster against low quality imitations. But would it be in the best interest of Australian producers and consumers to simply capitulate to demands about New Zealand Manuka, or about GIs in general?
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Conversation
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'The Manuka honey fight is one we have to have'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this