TY - JOUR
T1 - The management of transport construction projects: A survey of public sector organisations in Queensland Australia
AU - Adighibe, Charles
AU - Skitmore, Martin
AU - Wong, Johnny
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Construction procurement organisations in the Australian framework provide broad guidelines on project management in setting benchmark performance measurements and processes for evaluating their projects. Despite this, little has been known in the project management practise in transport construction projects in Australia, in particular Queensland. Questionnaire data from 53 project management practitioners employed in State and City public sector organisations in Queensland,suggested that many practitioners in the public sector have little or a lack of understanding of government regulatory policies, which are used as economic evaluation tools for project options. Public sector project managers perceive socio-economic evaluation tools as inappropriate for public sector projects. The survey results also found conducting risk management analysis, developing a risk register and mitigation of risks were most effective way of managing risk. This study provides an opportunity for the public sector to review and provide training on project management practices and government regulatory policies governing public projects. This will improve project management practitioners' understanding and interpretation of government regulatory policies.
AB - Construction procurement organisations in the Australian framework provide broad guidelines on project management in setting benchmark performance measurements and processes for evaluating their projects. Despite this, little has been known in the project management practise in transport construction projects in Australia, in particular Queensland. Questionnaire data from 53 project management practitioners employed in State and City public sector organisations in Queensland,suggested that many practitioners in the public sector have little or a lack of understanding of government regulatory policies, which are used as economic evaluation tools for project options. Public sector project managers perceive socio-economic evaluation tools as inappropriate for public sector projects. The survey results also found conducting risk management analysis, developing a risk register and mitigation of risks were most effective way of managing risk. This study provides an opportunity for the public sector to review and provide training on project management practices and government regulatory policies governing public projects. This will improve project management practitioners' understanding and interpretation of government regulatory policies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949832362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15623599.2010.10773136
DO - 10.1080/15623599.2010.10773136
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77949832362
SN - 1562-3599
VL - 10
SP - 17
EP - 33
JO - International Journal of Construction Management
JF - International Journal of Construction Management
IS - 1
ER -