The long arm of the law: An examination of the utility of police post-separation discipline processes

Terrence Goldsworthy, Sara Trainor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Australia, a number of police services haveextended or are considering extending the reachof discipline sanctions to officers who have left theemploy of a service. The purpose of such processesis to enable disciplinary action to be taken againstformer police officers who commit serious breachesof discipline or misconduct and resign, retire or otherwisecease employment prior to the matter beingfinalised. There has been little examination of theeffectiveness of such processes or the use of such.The issues that led to the implementation of postseparationprocesses in the Australian context arediscussed. This article examines the usage rates ofpost-separation processes and also the organisationalresponses of Australian police services to such. Thefindings revealed that there has been little use ofpost-separation discipline processes in AustralianPolice Services. The article discusses the utility ofprosecuting officers who have left employment interms of the costs of preparing and pursuing thesematters and the outcomes achieved by such actions. Acomparative analysis of the policy approach of policeservices in Australia determined that it is unlikelythat post-separation processes will emerge as an effectivetool to combat misconduct and corruption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-254
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Police Science and Management
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

police
examination
Law
policy approach
police officer
sanction
corruption
costs

Cite this

@article{bdcad55754084518b6025b04bb976e68,
title = "The long arm of the law: An examination of the utility of police post-separation discipline processes",
abstract = "In Australia, a number of police services haveextended or are considering extending the reachof discipline sanctions to officers who have left theemploy of a service. The purpose of such processesis to enable disciplinary action to be taken againstformer police officers who commit serious breachesof discipline or misconduct and resign, retire or otherwisecease employment prior to the matter beingfinalised. There has been little examination of theeffectiveness of such processes or the use of such.The issues that led to the implementation of postseparationprocesses in the Australian context arediscussed. This article examines the usage rates ofpost-separation processes and also the organisationalresponses of Australian police services to such. Thefindings revealed that there has been little use ofpost-separation discipline processes in AustralianPolice Services. The article discusses the utility ofprosecuting officers who have left employment interms of the costs of preparing and pursuing thesematters and the outcomes achieved by such actions. Acomparative analysis of the policy approach of policeservices in Australia determined that it is unlikelythat post-separation processes will emerge as an effectivetool to combat misconduct and corruption.",
author = "Terrence Goldsworthy and Sara Trainor",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1350/ijps.2014.16.4.343",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "245--254",
journal = "International Journal of Police Science and Management",
issn = "1461-3557",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The long arm of the law: An examination of the utility of police post-separation discipline processes. / Goldsworthy, Terrence; Trainor, Sara.

In: International Journal of Police Science and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2014, p. 245-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The long arm of the law: An examination of the utility of police post-separation discipline processes

AU - Goldsworthy, Terrence

AU - Trainor, Sara

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In Australia, a number of police services haveextended or are considering extending the reachof discipline sanctions to officers who have left theemploy of a service. The purpose of such processesis to enable disciplinary action to be taken againstformer police officers who commit serious breachesof discipline or misconduct and resign, retire or otherwisecease employment prior to the matter beingfinalised. There has been little examination of theeffectiveness of such processes or the use of such.The issues that led to the implementation of postseparationprocesses in the Australian context arediscussed. This article examines the usage rates ofpost-separation processes and also the organisationalresponses of Australian police services to such. Thefindings revealed that there has been little use ofpost-separation discipline processes in AustralianPolice Services. The article discusses the utility ofprosecuting officers who have left employment interms of the costs of preparing and pursuing thesematters and the outcomes achieved by such actions. Acomparative analysis of the policy approach of policeservices in Australia determined that it is unlikelythat post-separation processes will emerge as an effectivetool to combat misconduct and corruption.

AB - In Australia, a number of police services haveextended or are considering extending the reachof discipline sanctions to officers who have left theemploy of a service. The purpose of such processesis to enable disciplinary action to be taken againstformer police officers who commit serious breachesof discipline or misconduct and resign, retire or otherwisecease employment prior to the matter beingfinalised. There has been little examination of theeffectiveness of such processes or the use of such.The issues that led to the implementation of postseparationprocesses in the Australian context arediscussed. This article examines the usage rates ofpost-separation processes and also the organisationalresponses of Australian police services to such. Thefindings revealed that there has been little use ofpost-separation discipline processes in AustralianPolice Services. The article discusses the utility ofprosecuting officers who have left employment interms of the costs of preparing and pursuing thesematters and the outcomes achieved by such actions. Acomparative analysis of the policy approach of policeservices in Australia determined that it is unlikelythat post-separation processes will emerge as an effectivetool to combat misconduct and corruption.

U2 - 10.1350/ijps.2014.16.4.343

DO - 10.1350/ijps.2014.16.4.343

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 245

EP - 254

JO - International Journal of Police Science and Management

JF - International Journal of Police Science and Management

SN - 1461-3557

IS - 4

ER -