The liability-sanction relationship: A case study in the effectiveness of the corporate regulatory regime

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses the effectiveness of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as a regulatory tool for the sector. The Act regulates the conduct of directors by (i) establishing liability and (ii) imposing sanctions. The liability-sanction relationship determines the effectiveness of regulation. The relationship is further affected by the correlation between the sanctions imposed and the principles supporting those sanctions. This article uses Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) (2011) 196 FCR 430 as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Act in regulating the conduct of corporate directors. The article concludes that the sanctions imposed on the errant directors are not supported by the principle identified as underpinning them. Further, the article makes recommendations in relation to more appropriate sanctions in circumstances similar to those in the matter under discussion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-377
Number of pages13
JournalCompany and Securities Law Journal
Volume31
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

sanction
liability
director
act
corporation
regulation

Cite this

@article{e4265a3b7b2d4881b342f9edf03cbf21,
title = "The liability-sanction relationship: A case study in the effectiveness of the corporate regulatory regime",
abstract = "This article analyses the effectiveness of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as a regulatory tool for the sector. The Act regulates the conduct of directors by (i) establishing liability and (ii) imposing sanctions. The liability-sanction relationship determines the effectiveness of regulation. The relationship is further affected by the correlation between the sanctions imposed and the principles supporting those sanctions. This article uses Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) (2011) 196 FCR 430 as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Act in regulating the conduct of corporate directors. The article concludes that the sanctions imposed on the errant directors are not supported by the principle identified as underpinning them. Further, the article makes recommendations in relation to more appropriate sanctions in circumstances similar to those in the matter under discussion.",
author = "M Nicolae",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "365--377",
journal = "Company and Securities Law Journal",
issn = "0729-2775",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "6",

}

The liability-sanction relationship : A case study in the effectiveness of the corporate regulatory regime. / Nicolae, M.

In: Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2013, p. 365-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The liability-sanction relationship

T2 - A case study in the effectiveness of the corporate regulatory regime

AU - Nicolae, M

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article analyses the effectiveness of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as a regulatory tool for the sector. The Act regulates the conduct of directors by (i) establishing liability and (ii) imposing sanctions. The liability-sanction relationship determines the effectiveness of regulation. The relationship is further affected by the correlation between the sanctions imposed and the principles supporting those sanctions. This article uses Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) (2011) 196 FCR 430 as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Act in regulating the conduct of corporate directors. The article concludes that the sanctions imposed on the errant directors are not supported by the principle identified as underpinning them. Further, the article makes recommendations in relation to more appropriate sanctions in circumstances similar to those in the matter under discussion.

AB - This article analyses the effectiveness of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as a regulatory tool for the sector. The Act regulates the conduct of directors by (i) establishing liability and (ii) imposing sanctions. The liability-sanction relationship determines the effectiveness of regulation. The relationship is further affected by the correlation between the sanctions imposed and the principles supporting those sanctions. This article uses Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) (2011) 196 FCR 430 as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Act in regulating the conduct of corporate directors. The article concludes that the sanctions imposed on the errant directors are not supported by the principle identified as underpinning them. Further, the article makes recommendations in relation to more appropriate sanctions in circumstances similar to those in the matter under discussion.

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 365

EP - 377

JO - Company and Securities Law Journal

JF - Company and Securities Law Journal

SN - 0729-2775

IS - 6

ER -