The law textbook: Same same?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Subsequent to the middle of the 19th century the university increasingly became the centre of legal education. At this time, one of its primary aims was to provide students with an accurate and complete account of the practice of law (Cownie, 2006). The generality of the study of law meant that students were exposed to a larger and ever increasing volume of information. Feasibly, this could only be achieved if the delivery of information was done in a systematic way. The textbook became the principal platform for teaching law as it allowed for such systematic delivery of content (Cownie, 2006). The textbook, as a method of instruction, continues to be central to organised pedagogy at all grade levels (from primary to tertiary education) and across all disciplines (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). Despite the benefit of systematic organisation, the long production and distribution cycle of textbooks means that they provide students with trailing rather than leading edge information (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). This effect is even more pronounced in rapidly changing subject areas, such as law. Additionally, the legal profession and the global market demand that graduates possess more than a theoretical knowledge of the legal system and its workings. To be competitive, apart from a doctrinal knowledge of the law, the recent graduate must possess a complement of creative problem-solving and critical thinking skills (Thomas, 2000).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond
EditorsK Wood, D Knight, S Kinash
Place of PublicationBond University
PublisherOffice of Learning and Teaching, Bond University
Pages39-43
Number of pages5
Volume2
ISBN (Print)9781922183026
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

textbook
Law
graduate
legal profession
student
legal system
education
school grade
instruction
university
demand
market
Teaching

Cite this

Nicolae, M. (2012). The law textbook: Same same? In K. Wood, D. Knight, & S. Kinash (Eds.), Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond (Vol. 2, pp. 39-43). Bond University: Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University.
Nicolae, M. / The law textbook: Same same?. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond. editor / K Wood ; D Knight ; S Kinash. Vol. 2 Bond University : Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University, 2012. pp. 39-43
@inbook{6140b82e0c7e4d88ae670c60d15acac6,
title = "The law textbook: Same same?",
abstract = "Subsequent to the middle of the 19th century the university increasingly became the centre of legal education. At this time, one of its primary aims was to provide students with an accurate and complete account of the practice of law (Cownie, 2006). The generality of the study of law meant that students were exposed to a larger and ever increasing volume of information. Feasibly, this could only be achieved if the delivery of information was done in a systematic way. The textbook became the principal platform for teaching law as it allowed for such systematic delivery of content (Cownie, 2006). The textbook, as a method of instruction, continues to be central to organised pedagogy at all grade levels (from primary to tertiary education) and across all disciplines (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). Despite the benefit of systematic organisation, the long production and distribution cycle of textbooks means that they provide students with trailing rather than leading edge information (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). This effect is even more pronounced in rapidly changing subject areas, such as law. Additionally, the legal profession and the global market demand that graduates possess more than a theoretical knowledge of the legal system and its workings. To be competitive, apart from a doctrinal knowledge of the law, the recent graduate must possess a complement of creative problem-solving and critical thinking skills (Thomas, 2000).",
author = "M Nicolae",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781922183026",
volume = "2",
pages = "39--43",
editor = "K Wood and D Knight and S Kinash",
booktitle = "Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond",
publisher = "Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University",

}

Nicolae, M 2012, The law textbook: Same same? in K Wood, D Knight & S Kinash (eds), Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond. vol. 2, Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University, Bond University, pp. 39-43.

The law textbook: Same same? / Nicolae, M.

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond. ed. / K Wood; D Knight; S Kinash. Vol. 2 Bond University : Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University, 2012. p. 39-43.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The law textbook: Same same?

AU - Nicolae, M

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Subsequent to the middle of the 19th century the university increasingly became the centre of legal education. At this time, one of its primary aims was to provide students with an accurate and complete account of the practice of law (Cownie, 2006). The generality of the study of law meant that students were exposed to a larger and ever increasing volume of information. Feasibly, this could only be achieved if the delivery of information was done in a systematic way. The textbook became the principal platform for teaching law as it allowed for such systematic delivery of content (Cownie, 2006). The textbook, as a method of instruction, continues to be central to organised pedagogy at all grade levels (from primary to tertiary education) and across all disciplines (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). Despite the benefit of systematic organisation, the long production and distribution cycle of textbooks means that they provide students with trailing rather than leading edge information (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). This effect is even more pronounced in rapidly changing subject areas, such as law. Additionally, the legal profession and the global market demand that graduates possess more than a theoretical knowledge of the legal system and its workings. To be competitive, apart from a doctrinal knowledge of the law, the recent graduate must possess a complement of creative problem-solving and critical thinking skills (Thomas, 2000).

AB - Subsequent to the middle of the 19th century the university increasingly became the centre of legal education. At this time, one of its primary aims was to provide students with an accurate and complete account of the practice of law (Cownie, 2006). The generality of the study of law meant that students were exposed to a larger and ever increasing volume of information. Feasibly, this could only be achieved if the delivery of information was done in a systematic way. The textbook became the principal platform for teaching law as it allowed for such systematic delivery of content (Cownie, 2006). The textbook, as a method of instruction, continues to be central to organised pedagogy at all grade levels (from primary to tertiary education) and across all disciplines (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). Despite the benefit of systematic organisation, the long production and distribution cycle of textbooks means that they provide students with trailing rather than leading edge information (Onderdonk, Allen & Allen, 2009). This effect is even more pronounced in rapidly changing subject areas, such as law. Additionally, the legal profession and the global market demand that graduates possess more than a theoretical knowledge of the legal system and its workings. To be competitive, apart from a doctrinal knowledge of the law, the recent graduate must possess a complement of creative problem-solving and critical thinking skills (Thomas, 2000).

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781922183026

VL - 2

SP - 39

EP - 43

BT - Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond

A2 - Wood, K

A2 - Knight, D

A2 - Kinash, S

PB - Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University

CY - Bond University

ER -

Nicolae M. The law textbook: Same same? In Wood K, Knight D, Kinash S, editors, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning @ Bond. Vol. 2. Bond University: Office of Learning and Teaching, Bond University. 2012. p. 39-43