The investment value of the value premium

Tim Brailsford, Clive Gaunt, Michael A. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Value investment strategies are premised on research that value stocks outperform growth stocks. However, the research findings are dependent on the portfolio classification method that is used to sort stocks using the attributes of size and book-to-market ratios. Different stock markets contain different distributions of stocks, and in many markets, illiquidity concerns combined with a lack of investment scale, effectively create barriers to practical portfolio formations that align with the research. This study conducts a case study on one such market (Australia) and demonstrates that different methods of portfolio formation lead to different conclusions. For example, previous studies in Australia find evidence of the value premium only being present in the largest stocks, in contrast to the results from the US market. However, we find a value premium that is systematic across all size categories and generally increases inversely with size. Further, we find the well-documented size premium largely disappears once portfolios are formed that better represent feasible investment sets and once 'penny dreadfuls' are removed. Finally, asset pricing tests support the existence of a value premium in Australian stock returns when a more appropriate portfolio formation method is employed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-437
Number of pages22
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Value premium
Asset pricing
Value stocks
Growth stocks
Investment strategy
Book-to-market ratio
Premium
Stock market
Illiquidity
Stock returns

Cite this

Brailsford, Tim ; Gaunt, Clive ; O'Brien, Michael A. / The investment value of the value premium. In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 416-437.
@article{50435968fa3c4e6aa4f3efe487f9e1e9,
title = "The investment value of the value premium",
abstract = "Value investment strategies are premised on research that value stocks outperform growth stocks. However, the research findings are dependent on the portfolio classification method that is used to sort stocks using the attributes of size and book-to-market ratios. Different stock markets contain different distributions of stocks, and in many markets, illiquidity concerns combined with a lack of investment scale, effectively create barriers to practical portfolio formations that align with the research. This study conducts a case study on one such market (Australia) and demonstrates that different methods of portfolio formation lead to different conclusions. For example, previous studies in Australia find evidence of the value premium only being present in the largest stocks, in contrast to the results from the US market. However, we find a value premium that is systematic across all size categories and generally increases inversely with size. Further, we find the well-documented size premium largely disappears once portfolios are formed that better represent feasible investment sets and once 'penny dreadfuls' are removed. Finally, asset pricing tests support the existence of a value premium in Australian stock returns when a more appropriate portfolio formation method is employed.",
author = "Tim Brailsford and Clive Gaunt and O'Brien, {Michael A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "416--437",
journal = "Pacific Basin Finance Journal",
issn = "0927-538X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Brailsford, T, Gaunt, C & O'Brien, MA 2012, 'The investment value of the value premium' Pacific Basin Finance Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 416-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.12.008

The investment value of the value premium. / Brailsford, Tim; Gaunt, Clive; O'Brien, Michael A.

In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 416-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The investment value of the value premium

AU - Brailsford, Tim

AU - Gaunt, Clive

AU - O'Brien, Michael A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Value investment strategies are premised on research that value stocks outperform growth stocks. However, the research findings are dependent on the portfolio classification method that is used to sort stocks using the attributes of size and book-to-market ratios. Different stock markets contain different distributions of stocks, and in many markets, illiquidity concerns combined with a lack of investment scale, effectively create barriers to practical portfolio formations that align with the research. This study conducts a case study on one such market (Australia) and demonstrates that different methods of portfolio formation lead to different conclusions. For example, previous studies in Australia find evidence of the value premium only being present in the largest stocks, in contrast to the results from the US market. However, we find a value premium that is systematic across all size categories and generally increases inversely with size. Further, we find the well-documented size premium largely disappears once portfolios are formed that better represent feasible investment sets and once 'penny dreadfuls' are removed. Finally, asset pricing tests support the existence of a value premium in Australian stock returns when a more appropriate portfolio formation method is employed.

AB - Value investment strategies are premised on research that value stocks outperform growth stocks. However, the research findings are dependent on the portfolio classification method that is used to sort stocks using the attributes of size and book-to-market ratios. Different stock markets contain different distributions of stocks, and in many markets, illiquidity concerns combined with a lack of investment scale, effectively create barriers to practical portfolio formations that align with the research. This study conducts a case study on one such market (Australia) and demonstrates that different methods of portfolio formation lead to different conclusions. For example, previous studies in Australia find evidence of the value premium only being present in the largest stocks, in contrast to the results from the US market. However, we find a value premium that is systematic across all size categories and generally increases inversely with size. Further, we find the well-documented size premium largely disappears once portfolios are formed that better represent feasible investment sets and once 'penny dreadfuls' are removed. Finally, asset pricing tests support the existence of a value premium in Australian stock returns when a more appropriate portfolio formation method is employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856057123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 416

EP - 437

JO - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

JF - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

SN - 0927-538X

IS - 3

ER -