TY - JOUR
T1 - The international universities walking project: Development of a framework for workplace intervention using the delphi technique
AU - Gilson, Nicholas
AU - Brown, Wendy J.
AU - Faulkner, Guy
AU - McKenna, Jim
AU - Murphy, Marie
AU - Pringle, Andy
AU - Proper, Karin
AU - Puig-Ribera, Anna
AU - Stathi, Aphroditi
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - This paper aimed to use the Delphi technique to develop a consensus framework for a multinational, workplace walking intervention. Methods: Ideas were gathered and ranked from eight recognized and emerging experts in the fields of physical activity and health, from universities in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, and Spain. Members of the panel were asked to consider the key characteristics of a successful campus walking intervention. Consensus was reached by an inductive, content analytic approach, conducted through an anonymous, three-round, e-mail process. Results: The resulting framework consisted of three interlinking themes defined as "design, implementation, and evaluation." Top-ranked subi- tems in these themes included the need to generate research capacity (design), to respond to group needs through different walking approaches (implementation), and to undertake physical activity assessment (evaluation). Themes were set within an underpinning domain, referred to as the "institution" and sites are currently engaging with subitems in this domain, to provide sustainable interventions that reflect the practicalities of local contexts and needs. Conclusions: Findings provide a unique framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating walking projects in universities and highlight the value of adopting the Delphi technique for planning international, multisite health initiatives.
AB - This paper aimed to use the Delphi technique to develop a consensus framework for a multinational, workplace walking intervention. Methods: Ideas were gathered and ranked from eight recognized and emerging experts in the fields of physical activity and health, from universities in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, and Spain. Members of the panel were asked to consider the key characteristics of a successful campus walking intervention. Consensus was reached by an inductive, content analytic approach, conducted through an anonymous, three-round, e-mail process. Results: The resulting framework consisted of three interlinking themes defined as "design, implementation, and evaluation." Top-ranked subi- tems in these themes included the need to generate research capacity (design), to respond to group needs through different walking approaches (implementation), and to undertake physical activity assessment (evaluation). Themes were set within an underpinning domain, referred to as the "institution" and sites are currently engaging with subitems in this domain, to provide sustainable interventions that reflect the practicalities of local contexts and needs. Conclusions: Findings provide a unique framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating walking projects in universities and highlight the value of adopting the Delphi technique for planning international, multisite health initiatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650797308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.6.4.520
DO - 10.1123/jpah.6.4.520
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67650797308
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 6
SP - 520
EP - 528
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 4
ER -