The 'Institutional' integrity principle: Where are we now and where are we headed?

Chris Steytler, Iain Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the 'institutional integrity' principle, first enunciated in Kable, in the wake of three recent High Court decisions: International Finance Trust, Totani and Wainohu. This article is primarily intended to provide the profession, lawmakers and others with an interest in Chapter III jurisprudence, with a detailed guide as to the basis, object and scope of the institutional integrity principle. A number of questions are also identified, which have been left unanswered by the existing case law, and some comment is provided as to the likely development of the principle in future cases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-264
Number of pages38
JournalUniversity of Western Australia Law Review
Volume35
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

integrity
court decision
case law
jurisprudence
finance
profession

Cite this

@article{c3ce7734b0fd400dba3f092c3ba9855c,
title = "The 'Institutional' integrity principle: Where are we now and where are we headed?",
abstract = "This article examines the 'institutional integrity' principle, first enunciated in Kable, in the wake of three recent High Court decisions: International Finance Trust, Totani and Wainohu. This article is primarily intended to provide the profession, lawmakers and others with an interest in Chapter III jurisprudence, with a detailed guide as to the basis, object and scope of the institutional integrity principle. A number of questions are also identified, which have been left unanswered by the existing case law, and some comment is provided as to the likely development of the principle in future cases.",
author = "Chris Steytler and Iain Field",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "227--264",
journal = "University of Western Australia Law Review",
issn = "0042-0328",
publisher = "University of Western Australia",
number = "2",

}

The 'Institutional' integrity principle: Where are we now and where are we headed? / Steytler, Chris; Field, Iain.

In: University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2011, p. 227-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'Institutional' integrity principle: Where are we now and where are we headed?

AU - Steytler, Chris

AU - Field, Iain

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article examines the 'institutional integrity' principle, first enunciated in Kable, in the wake of three recent High Court decisions: International Finance Trust, Totani and Wainohu. This article is primarily intended to provide the profession, lawmakers and others with an interest in Chapter III jurisprudence, with a detailed guide as to the basis, object and scope of the institutional integrity principle. A number of questions are also identified, which have been left unanswered by the existing case law, and some comment is provided as to the likely development of the principle in future cases.

AB - This article examines the 'institutional integrity' principle, first enunciated in Kable, in the wake of three recent High Court decisions: International Finance Trust, Totani and Wainohu. This article is primarily intended to provide the profession, lawmakers and others with an interest in Chapter III jurisprudence, with a detailed guide as to the basis, object and scope of the institutional integrity principle. A number of questions are also identified, which have been left unanswered by the existing case law, and some comment is provided as to the likely development of the principle in future cases.

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 227

EP - 264

JO - University of Western Australia Law Review

JF - University of Western Australia Law Review

SN - 0042-0328

IS - 2

ER -