The institution of intercourse: Andrea Dworkin on the Biblical foundations of violence against women

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to the late Radical Feminist thinker Andrea Dworkin, in her notorious book Intercourse (1987), women’s second-class status is attributable to the socially constructed definition of our bodies as lacking in physical integrity during intercourse. As a strictly materialist analysis of intercourse, of intercourse as an institutional practice distinct from intercourse as an unmediated individual experience, Dworkin’s focus is on those discourses (literary, philosophical, religious, legal) that have effectively constructed the political meaning of intercourse. Her analysis concerns the broader and complicated contextual relations of power within which the act takes place. It is this socially constructed determination of intercourse as “a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior” that underwrites all violence against women, indeed what naturalizes it, according to Dworkin. In this essay, I shall explore Dworkin’s discussions concerning the role of Genesis 2:4b-4:1 and the sodomy laws in Leviticus in the institutionalization of intercourse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-40
Number of pages17
JournalThe Bible and Critical Theory
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Violence against Women
Institutionalization
Genesis
Leviticus
Materialist
Physical
Literary Discourse
Sodomy
Religion
Integrity
Contextual
Thinkers

Cite this

@article{de396ace2c4e438583b93db8de6d71d7,
title = "The institution of intercourse: Andrea Dworkin on the Biblical foundations of violence against women",
abstract = "According to the late Radical Feminist thinker Andrea Dworkin, in her notorious book Intercourse (1987), women’s second-class status is attributable to the socially constructed definition of our bodies as lacking in physical integrity during intercourse. As a strictly materialist analysis of intercourse, of intercourse as an institutional practice distinct from intercourse as an unmediated individual experience, Dworkin’s focus is on those discourses (literary, philosophical, religious, legal) that have effectively constructed the political meaning of intercourse. Her analysis concerns the broader and complicated contextual relations of power within which the act takes place. It is this socially constructed determination of intercourse as “a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior” that underwrites all violence against women, indeed what naturalizes it, according to Dworkin. In this essay, I shall explore Dworkin’s discussions concerning the role of Genesis 2:4b-4:1 and the sodomy laws in Leviticus in the institutionalization of intercourse.",
author = "Julie-Anne Kelso",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "24--40",
journal = "The Bible and Critical Theory",
issn = "1832-3391",
publisher = "Monash University ePress",

}

The institution of intercourse : Andrea Dworkin on the Biblical foundations of violence against women. / Kelso, Julie-Anne.

In: The Bible and Critical Theory, 2016, p. 24-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The institution of intercourse

T2 - Andrea Dworkin on the Biblical foundations of violence against women

AU - Kelso, Julie-Anne

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - According to the late Radical Feminist thinker Andrea Dworkin, in her notorious book Intercourse (1987), women’s second-class status is attributable to the socially constructed definition of our bodies as lacking in physical integrity during intercourse. As a strictly materialist analysis of intercourse, of intercourse as an institutional practice distinct from intercourse as an unmediated individual experience, Dworkin’s focus is on those discourses (literary, philosophical, religious, legal) that have effectively constructed the political meaning of intercourse. Her analysis concerns the broader and complicated contextual relations of power within which the act takes place. It is this socially constructed determination of intercourse as “a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior” that underwrites all violence against women, indeed what naturalizes it, according to Dworkin. In this essay, I shall explore Dworkin’s discussions concerning the role of Genesis 2:4b-4:1 and the sodomy laws in Leviticus in the institutionalization of intercourse.

AB - According to the late Radical Feminist thinker Andrea Dworkin, in her notorious book Intercourse (1987), women’s second-class status is attributable to the socially constructed definition of our bodies as lacking in physical integrity during intercourse. As a strictly materialist analysis of intercourse, of intercourse as an institutional practice distinct from intercourse as an unmediated individual experience, Dworkin’s focus is on those discourses (literary, philosophical, religious, legal) that have effectively constructed the political meaning of intercourse. Her analysis concerns the broader and complicated contextual relations of power within which the act takes place. It is this socially constructed determination of intercourse as “a means or the means of physiologically making a woman inferior” that underwrites all violence against women, indeed what naturalizes it, according to Dworkin. In this essay, I shall explore Dworkin’s discussions concerning the role of Genesis 2:4b-4:1 and the sodomy laws in Leviticus in the institutionalization of intercourse.

M3 - Article

SP - 24

EP - 40

JO - The Bible and Critical Theory

JF - The Bible and Critical Theory

SN - 1832-3391

ER -