The influence of the pericellular microenvironment on the chondrocyte response to osmotic challenge

W. A. Hing, A. F. Sherwin, J. M. Ross, C. A. Poole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether differences in the pericellular microenvironment of different chondron preparations influence the chondrocyte volume regulatory response to experimental osmotic challenge. Design: Mechanically, extracted chondrons (MC), enzymatically extracted chondrons (EC) and isolated chondrocytes (IC) were seeded into agarose and sampled at 1, 3 and 7 days. Samples mounted in a perfusion chamber were subjected to osmotic challenge. The cross-sectional areas of the chondrocyte and pericellular microenvironment were measured under isotonic, hypertonic and hypotonic conditions, and percentage change calculated. Separate samples were immunolabeled for type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. Results: Initially, the microenvironment of MC represented 60% of the chondron area and was occupied by type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. In EC, the microenvironment comprised 18% of the chondron area with narrow bands of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. IC had no visible microenvironment, with small amounts of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate present. All preparations sequestered additional pericellular macromolecules during culture. Under isotonic conditions, the EC and IC chondrocytes were larger than those of MC. All chondrocytes shrank under hypertonic conditions and swelled under hypotonic conditions. MC were the least responsive, displaying the most efficient volume regulation. IC showed the largest response initially but this decreased with time. EC exhibited intermediate responses that decreased as the microenvironment increased in size. Conclusions: The composition and structural integrity of the pericellular microenvironment do influence the cellular response to experimental osmotic challenge. This suggests that the microenvironment functions in situ to mediate the chondrocyte response to physicochemical changes associated with joint loading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-307
Number of pages11
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chondrocytes
Collagen
Collagen Type VI
Keratan Sulfate
Structural integrity
Macromolecules
Sulfates
Chemical analysis
Sepharose
Perfusion
Joints

Cite this

Hing, W. A. ; Sherwin, A. F. ; Ross, J. M. ; Poole, C. A. / The influence of the pericellular microenvironment on the chondrocyte response to osmotic challenge. In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2002 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 297-307.
@article{dc533ce79ba0431e942b3745c2ebedb9,
title = "The influence of the pericellular microenvironment on the chondrocyte response to osmotic challenge",
abstract = "Objective: To examine whether differences in the pericellular microenvironment of different chondron preparations influence the chondrocyte volume regulatory response to experimental osmotic challenge. Design: Mechanically, extracted chondrons (MC), enzymatically extracted chondrons (EC) and isolated chondrocytes (IC) were seeded into agarose and sampled at 1, 3 and 7 days. Samples mounted in a perfusion chamber were subjected to osmotic challenge. The cross-sectional areas of the chondrocyte and pericellular microenvironment were measured under isotonic, hypertonic and hypotonic conditions, and percentage change calculated. Separate samples were immunolabeled for type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. Results: Initially, the microenvironment of MC represented 60{\%} of the chondron area and was occupied by type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. In EC, the microenvironment comprised 18{\%} of the chondron area with narrow bands of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. IC had no visible microenvironment, with small amounts of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate present. All preparations sequestered additional pericellular macromolecules during culture. Under isotonic conditions, the EC and IC chondrocytes were larger than those of MC. All chondrocytes shrank under hypertonic conditions and swelled under hypotonic conditions. MC were the least responsive, displaying the most efficient volume regulation. IC showed the largest response initially but this decreased with time. EC exhibited intermediate responses that decreased as the microenvironment increased in size. Conclusions: The composition and structural integrity of the pericellular microenvironment do influence the cellular response to experimental osmotic challenge. This suggests that the microenvironment functions in situ to mediate the chondrocyte response to physicochemical changes associated with joint loading.",
author = "Hing, {W. A.} and Sherwin, {A. F.} and Ross, {J. M.} and Poole, {C. A.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1053/joca.2002.0517",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "297--307",
journal = "Osteoarthritis and Cartilage",
issn = "1063-4584",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The influence of the pericellular microenvironment on the chondrocyte response to osmotic challenge. / Hing, W. A.; Sherwin, A. F.; Ross, J. M.; Poole, C. A.

In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2002, p. 297-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of the pericellular microenvironment on the chondrocyte response to osmotic challenge

AU - Hing, W. A.

AU - Sherwin, A. F.

AU - Ross, J. M.

AU - Poole, C. A.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective: To examine whether differences in the pericellular microenvironment of different chondron preparations influence the chondrocyte volume regulatory response to experimental osmotic challenge. Design: Mechanically, extracted chondrons (MC), enzymatically extracted chondrons (EC) and isolated chondrocytes (IC) were seeded into agarose and sampled at 1, 3 and 7 days. Samples mounted in a perfusion chamber were subjected to osmotic challenge. The cross-sectional areas of the chondrocyte and pericellular microenvironment were measured under isotonic, hypertonic and hypotonic conditions, and percentage change calculated. Separate samples were immunolabeled for type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. Results: Initially, the microenvironment of MC represented 60% of the chondron area and was occupied by type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. In EC, the microenvironment comprised 18% of the chondron area with narrow bands of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. IC had no visible microenvironment, with small amounts of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate present. All preparations sequestered additional pericellular macromolecules during culture. Under isotonic conditions, the EC and IC chondrocytes were larger than those of MC. All chondrocytes shrank under hypertonic conditions and swelled under hypotonic conditions. MC were the least responsive, displaying the most efficient volume regulation. IC showed the largest response initially but this decreased with time. EC exhibited intermediate responses that decreased as the microenvironment increased in size. Conclusions: The composition and structural integrity of the pericellular microenvironment do influence the cellular response to experimental osmotic challenge. This suggests that the microenvironment functions in situ to mediate the chondrocyte response to physicochemical changes associated with joint loading.

AB - Objective: To examine whether differences in the pericellular microenvironment of different chondron preparations influence the chondrocyte volume regulatory response to experimental osmotic challenge. Design: Mechanically, extracted chondrons (MC), enzymatically extracted chondrons (EC) and isolated chondrocytes (IC) were seeded into agarose and sampled at 1, 3 and 7 days. Samples mounted in a perfusion chamber were subjected to osmotic challenge. The cross-sectional areas of the chondrocyte and pericellular microenvironment were measured under isotonic, hypertonic and hypotonic conditions, and percentage change calculated. Separate samples were immunolabeled for type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. Results: Initially, the microenvironment of MC represented 60% of the chondron area and was occupied by type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. In EC, the microenvironment comprised 18% of the chondron area with narrow bands of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate. IC had no visible microenvironment, with small amounts of type VI collagen and keratan sulfate present. All preparations sequestered additional pericellular macromolecules during culture. Under isotonic conditions, the EC and IC chondrocytes were larger than those of MC. All chondrocytes shrank under hypertonic conditions and swelled under hypotonic conditions. MC were the least responsive, displaying the most efficient volume regulation. IC showed the largest response initially but this decreased with time. EC exhibited intermediate responses that decreased as the microenvironment increased in size. Conclusions: The composition and structural integrity of the pericellular microenvironment do influence the cellular response to experimental osmotic challenge. This suggests that the microenvironment functions in situ to mediate the chondrocyte response to physicochemical changes associated with joint loading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036245375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/joca.2002.0517

DO - 10.1053/joca.2002.0517

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 297

EP - 307

JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

SN - 1063-4584

IS - 4

ER -