The inadequate legislative response to e-signatures

Jay Forder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the two most influential international initiatives on electronic signatures (UNCITRAL's 1996 Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1999 EU Electronic Signature Directive). It considers whether the legislative approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom based on these initiatives are helpful in deciding whether lower level signature methods such as simple email messages are likely to satisfy a legal requirement for a signature. The conclusion reached is that they are unhelpful. The article goes on to consider whether legislative amendments based on UNCITRAL's 2001 Model Law on Electronic Signatures or the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts would improve the identified weaknesses. It concludes that such an update would clarify some issues, but that overall it will not solve the difficulties. The article ends with a brief speculation on the likely attributes of a more helpful approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-426
Number of pages9
JournalComputer Law and Security Review
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

electronics
Electronic commerce
Electronic mail
UN Convention
electronic commerce
Law
Communication
speculation
amendment
communications
EU
Electronic signature
Electronic communication
Amendments
Speculation
United Nations

Cite this

Forder, Jay. / The inadequate legislative response to e-signatures. In: Computer Law and Security Review. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 418-426.
@article{617325162cd8409da6581e6cac41e554,
title = "The inadequate legislative response to e-signatures",
abstract = "This article examines the two most influential international initiatives on electronic signatures (UNCITRAL's 1996 Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1999 EU Electronic Signature Directive). It considers whether the legislative approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom based on these initiatives are helpful in deciding whether lower level signature methods such as simple email messages are likely to satisfy a legal requirement for a signature. The conclusion reached is that they are unhelpful. The article goes on to consider whether legislative amendments based on UNCITRAL's 2001 Model Law on Electronic Signatures or the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts would improve the identified weaknesses. It concludes that such an update would clarify some issues, but that overall it will not solve the difficulties. The article ends with a brief speculation on the likely attributes of a more helpful approach.",
author = "Jay Forder",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "418--426",
journal = "Computer Law and Security Review",
issn = "0267-3649",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

The inadequate legislative response to e-signatures. / Forder, Jay.

In: Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, 07.2010, p. 418-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inadequate legislative response to e-signatures

AU - Forder, Jay

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - This article examines the two most influential international initiatives on electronic signatures (UNCITRAL's 1996 Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1999 EU Electronic Signature Directive). It considers whether the legislative approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom based on these initiatives are helpful in deciding whether lower level signature methods such as simple email messages are likely to satisfy a legal requirement for a signature. The conclusion reached is that they are unhelpful. The article goes on to consider whether legislative amendments based on UNCITRAL's 2001 Model Law on Electronic Signatures or the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts would improve the identified weaknesses. It concludes that such an update would clarify some issues, but that overall it will not solve the difficulties. The article ends with a brief speculation on the likely attributes of a more helpful approach.

AB - This article examines the two most influential international initiatives on electronic signatures (UNCITRAL's 1996 Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1999 EU Electronic Signature Directive). It considers whether the legislative approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom based on these initiatives are helpful in deciding whether lower level signature methods such as simple email messages are likely to satisfy a legal requirement for a signature. The conclusion reached is that they are unhelpful. The article goes on to consider whether legislative amendments based on UNCITRAL's 2001 Model Law on Electronic Signatures or the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts would improve the identified weaknesses. It concludes that such an update would clarify some issues, but that overall it will not solve the difficulties. The article ends with a brief speculation on the likely attributes of a more helpful approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955604270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 418

EP - 426

JO - Computer Law and Security Review

JF - Computer Law and Security Review

SN - 0267-3649

IS - 4

ER -