The importance of randomised vs non-randomised trials

Benjamin Djulbegovic, Paul Glasziou, Iain Chalmers

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

[Extract] We thank Hertzel Gerstein and colleagues for reminding us of the importance of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, RCTs require uncertainty about the benefits of an intervention, and once an intervention has already become health policy, ethical issues with doing an RCT arise. For example, most childhood vaccines were introduced without being tested for their effects on overall health. Now, real-world studies suggest that vaccines could have non-specific effects, with important implications for overall health.2 However, most people would consider testing recommended vaccines in RCTs to be unethical. We have shown how triangulation of multiple sources of evidence with different confounder structures can be used to show causality when RCTs are not feasible
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)634-635
Number of pages2
JournalThe Lancet
Volume394
Issue number10199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of randomised vs non-randomised trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this