The impact of the return interval on the estimation of systematic risk

Timothy J. Brailsford, Thomas Josev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The estimation of systematic risk (or 'beta') is central to the implementation of the capital asset pricing model and the market model for both researchers and practitioners. It is well known that a variety of beta estimates can result for the one stock depending on various factors such as the calculation of returns, choice of the market index, sample period and length of the estimation period. In this paper, we are concerned with one such factor being the interval over which returns are measured. The impact of the return interval on the beta estimate is known as the 'interval effect'. There is only limited evidence on the impact of the interval effect outside the US equity market. As such, this paper first documents the impact of the effect in the Australian equity market. The initial results indicate that the beta estimates of high (low) capitalised firms fall (rise) as the return interval is lengthened. The paper then provides an understanding of the effect by testing the model proposed by [Hawawini, G., 1983. Why beta shifts as the return interval changes, Financial Analysts Journal 39, 73-77]. This model provides a prediction of the size and direction of change in the beta estimate as a result of changes in the return interval. The empirical results generally support the predictions. These findings have implications for the use of beta estimates in portfolio and risk management, measurement of abnormal returns and testing of asset pricing models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-376
Number of pages20
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Systematic risk
Equity markets
Prediction
Factors
Testing
Risk management
Empirical results
Portfolio management
Asset pricing models
Market index
Market model
Capital asset pricing model
Financial analysts
Abnormal returns

Cite this

Brailsford, Timothy J. ; Josev, Thomas. / The impact of the return interval on the estimation of systematic risk. In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal. 1997 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 357-376.
@article{9b77daf1edab465ca82c5fe6fc5c7fc8,
title = "The impact of the return interval on the estimation of systematic risk",
abstract = "The estimation of systematic risk (or 'beta') is central to the implementation of the capital asset pricing model and the market model for both researchers and practitioners. It is well known that a variety of beta estimates can result for the one stock depending on various factors such as the calculation of returns, choice of the market index, sample period and length of the estimation period. In this paper, we are concerned with one such factor being the interval over which returns are measured. The impact of the return interval on the beta estimate is known as the 'interval effect'. There is only limited evidence on the impact of the interval effect outside the US equity market. As such, this paper first documents the impact of the effect in the Australian equity market. The initial results indicate that the beta estimates of high (low) capitalised firms fall (rise) as the return interval is lengthened. The paper then provides an understanding of the effect by testing the model proposed by [Hawawini, G., 1983. Why beta shifts as the return interval changes, Financial Analysts Journal 39, 73-77]. This model provides a prediction of the size and direction of change in the beta estimate as a result of changes in the return interval. The empirical results generally support the predictions. These findings have implications for the use of beta estimates in portfolio and risk management, measurement of abnormal returns and testing of asset pricing models.",
author = "Brailsford, {Timothy J.} and Thomas Josev",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0927-538X(97)00006-1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "357--376",
journal = "Pacific Basin Finance Journal",
issn = "0927-538X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The impact of the return interval on the estimation of systematic risk. / Brailsford, Timothy J.; Josev, Thomas.

In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, 07.1997, p. 357-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of the return interval on the estimation of systematic risk

AU - Brailsford, Timothy J.

AU - Josev, Thomas

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - The estimation of systematic risk (or 'beta') is central to the implementation of the capital asset pricing model and the market model for both researchers and practitioners. It is well known that a variety of beta estimates can result for the one stock depending on various factors such as the calculation of returns, choice of the market index, sample period and length of the estimation period. In this paper, we are concerned with one such factor being the interval over which returns are measured. The impact of the return interval on the beta estimate is known as the 'interval effect'. There is only limited evidence on the impact of the interval effect outside the US equity market. As such, this paper first documents the impact of the effect in the Australian equity market. The initial results indicate that the beta estimates of high (low) capitalised firms fall (rise) as the return interval is lengthened. The paper then provides an understanding of the effect by testing the model proposed by [Hawawini, G., 1983. Why beta shifts as the return interval changes, Financial Analysts Journal 39, 73-77]. This model provides a prediction of the size and direction of change in the beta estimate as a result of changes in the return interval. The empirical results generally support the predictions. These findings have implications for the use of beta estimates in portfolio and risk management, measurement of abnormal returns and testing of asset pricing models.

AB - The estimation of systematic risk (or 'beta') is central to the implementation of the capital asset pricing model and the market model for both researchers and practitioners. It is well known that a variety of beta estimates can result for the one stock depending on various factors such as the calculation of returns, choice of the market index, sample period and length of the estimation period. In this paper, we are concerned with one such factor being the interval over which returns are measured. The impact of the return interval on the beta estimate is known as the 'interval effect'. There is only limited evidence on the impact of the interval effect outside the US equity market. As such, this paper first documents the impact of the effect in the Australian equity market. The initial results indicate that the beta estimates of high (low) capitalised firms fall (rise) as the return interval is lengthened. The paper then provides an understanding of the effect by testing the model proposed by [Hawawini, G., 1983. Why beta shifts as the return interval changes, Financial Analysts Journal 39, 73-77]. This model provides a prediction of the size and direction of change in the beta estimate as a result of changes in the return interval. The empirical results generally support the predictions. These findings have implications for the use of beta estimates in portfolio and risk management, measurement of abnormal returns and testing of asset pricing models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031185080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0927-538X(97)00006-1

DO - 10.1016/S0927-538X(97)00006-1

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 357

EP - 376

JO - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

JF - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

SN - 0927-538X

IS - 3

ER -