The impact of regulatory focus and word of mouth valence on search and experience attribute evaluation

Rajat Roy, Vik Naidoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – This paper investigates the direct and interactive effects of regulatory focus(promotion versus prevention), attribute type (search versus experience) and word of mouth valence (positive versus negative) on consumption decision for a service and a product.

Design/methodology/approach – Three empirical studies (two laboratories and a field experiment) using ‘university’ and ‘mobile phone’ as the research setting were used to test the key hypotheses.

Findings – Promotion (prevention) focused subjects preferred experience (search) attributes over their counterparts while making consumption decision. This preference was further reinforced for both promotion and prevention focused people under positive word of mouth.Under negative word of mouth, in comparison to their counterparts, promotion focused people still retained their preference for experience attributes, while prevention focused subjects reversed their preference and maintained status quo.

Research limitations/implications – Future research may validate and extend our findings by looking into the underlying process or studying additional word of mouth variables that may moderate the current findings.Practical implications – Our findings will help managers devise a range of marketing strategies in the areas of advertising and product positioning, especially for products/services that are showcased in terms of experience and search attributes.

Originality/value – The current research is novel as no prior research has proposed and tested the two-way interaction between regulatory focus and search/experience attributes, or its further moderation by word of mouth valence.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages41
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume51
Issue number7/8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Word-of-mouth
Regulatory focus
Valence
Evaluation
Managers
Empirical study
Status quo
Product positioning
Field experiment
Mobile phone
Interaction
Negative word-of-mouth
Marketing strategy
Design methodology
Moderation

Cite this

@article{9c3d577e136247ae9c6000c178989a95,
title = "The impact of regulatory focus and word of mouth valence on search and experience attribute evaluation",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper investigates the direct and interactive effects of regulatory focus(promotion versus prevention), attribute type (search versus experience) and word of mouth valence (positive versus negative) on consumption decision for a service and a product.Design/methodology/approach – Three empirical studies (two laboratories and a field experiment) using ‘university’ and ‘mobile phone’ as the research setting were used to test the key hypotheses.Findings – Promotion (prevention) focused subjects preferred experience (search) attributes over their counterparts while making consumption decision. This preference was further reinforced for both promotion and prevention focused people under positive word of mouth.Under negative word of mouth, in comparison to their counterparts, promotion focused people still retained their preference for experience attributes, while prevention focused subjects reversed their preference and maintained status quo.Research limitations/implications – Future research may validate and extend our findings by looking into the underlying process or studying additional word of mouth variables that may moderate the current findings.Practical implications – Our findings will help managers devise a range of marketing strategies in the areas of advertising and product positioning, especially for products/services that are showcased in terms of experience and search attributes.Originality/value – The current research is novel as no prior research has proposed and tested the two-way interaction between regulatory focus and search/experience attributes, or its further moderation by word of mouth valence.",
author = "Rajat Roy and Vik Naidoo",
note = "Author email stating Bond affiliation",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/EJM-06-2016-0367",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7/8",

}

The impact of regulatory focus and word of mouth valence on search and experience attribute evaluation. / Roy, Rajat; Naidoo, Vik.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No. 7/8, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of regulatory focus and word of mouth valence on search and experience attribute evaluation

AU - Roy, Rajat

AU - Naidoo, Vik

N1 - Author email stating Bond affiliation

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose – This paper investigates the direct and interactive effects of regulatory focus(promotion versus prevention), attribute type (search versus experience) and word of mouth valence (positive versus negative) on consumption decision for a service and a product.Design/methodology/approach – Three empirical studies (two laboratories and a field experiment) using ‘university’ and ‘mobile phone’ as the research setting were used to test the key hypotheses.Findings – Promotion (prevention) focused subjects preferred experience (search) attributes over their counterparts while making consumption decision. This preference was further reinforced for both promotion and prevention focused people under positive word of mouth.Under negative word of mouth, in comparison to their counterparts, promotion focused people still retained their preference for experience attributes, while prevention focused subjects reversed their preference and maintained status quo.Research limitations/implications – Future research may validate and extend our findings by looking into the underlying process or studying additional word of mouth variables that may moderate the current findings.Practical implications – Our findings will help managers devise a range of marketing strategies in the areas of advertising and product positioning, especially for products/services that are showcased in terms of experience and search attributes.Originality/value – The current research is novel as no prior research has proposed and tested the two-way interaction between regulatory focus and search/experience attributes, or its further moderation by word of mouth valence.

AB - Purpose – This paper investigates the direct and interactive effects of regulatory focus(promotion versus prevention), attribute type (search versus experience) and word of mouth valence (positive versus negative) on consumption decision for a service and a product.Design/methodology/approach – Three empirical studies (two laboratories and a field experiment) using ‘university’ and ‘mobile phone’ as the research setting were used to test the key hypotheses.Findings – Promotion (prevention) focused subjects preferred experience (search) attributes over their counterparts while making consumption decision. This preference was further reinforced for both promotion and prevention focused people under positive word of mouth.Under negative word of mouth, in comparison to their counterparts, promotion focused people still retained their preference for experience attributes, while prevention focused subjects reversed their preference and maintained status quo.Research limitations/implications – Future research may validate and extend our findings by looking into the underlying process or studying additional word of mouth variables that may moderate the current findings.Practical implications – Our findings will help managers devise a range of marketing strategies in the areas of advertising and product positioning, especially for products/services that are showcased in terms of experience and search attributes.Originality/value – The current research is novel as no prior research has proposed and tested the two-way interaction between regulatory focus and search/experience attributes, or its further moderation by word of mouth valence.

U2 - 10.1108/EJM-06-2016-0367

DO - 10.1108/EJM-06-2016-0367

M3 - Article

VL - 51

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 7/8

ER -