The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility: a critical review of the literature

Simon D Carlton, Robin M Orr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Military personnel and firefighters are required to carry occupational loads and complete tasks in hostile and unpredictable environments where a lack of mobility may risk lives. This review critically examines the literature investigating the impacts of load carriage on the mobility of these specialist personnel. Several literature databases, reference lists, and subject matter experts were employed to identify relevant studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critiqued using the Downs and Black protocol. Inter-rater agreement was determined by Cohen's κ. Twelve original research studies, which included male and female participants from military and firefighting occupations, were critiqued (κ = .81). A review of these papers found that as the carried load weight increased, carrier mobility during aerobic tasks (like road marching) and anaerobic tasks (like obstacle course negotiation) decreased. As such, it can be concluded that the load carried by some specialist personnel may increase their occupational risk by reducing their mobility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-41
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Carrier mobility
Personnel
Firefighters
personnel
Negotiating
Military Personnel
Occupational risks
Occupations
Military
Databases
Weights and Measures
Research
occupation
inclusion
road
expert
literature
lack

Cite this

@article{333fc73cf5c44aadae0557f10d17531e,
title = "The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility: a critical review of the literature",
abstract = "Military personnel and firefighters are required to carry occupational loads and complete tasks in hostile and unpredictable environments where a lack of mobility may risk lives. This review critically examines the literature investigating the impacts of load carriage on the mobility of these specialist personnel. Several literature databases, reference lists, and subject matter experts were employed to identify relevant studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critiqued using the Downs and Black protocol. Inter-rater agreement was determined by Cohen's κ. Twelve original research studies, which included male and female participants from military and firefighting occupations, were critiqued (κ = .81). A review of these papers found that as the carried load weight increased, carrier mobility during aerobic tasks (like road marching) and anaerobic tasks (like obstacle course negotiation) decreased. As such, it can be concluded that the load carried by some specialist personnel may increase their occupational risk by reducing their mobility.",
author = "Carlton, {Simon D} and Orr, {Robin M}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/10803548.2014.11077025",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "33--41",
journal = "International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics",
issn = "1080-3548",
publisher = "Central Institute for Labour Protection",
number = "1",

}

The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility : a critical review of the literature. / Carlton, Simon D; Orr, Robin M.

In: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2014, p. 33-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility

T2 - a critical review of the literature

AU - Carlton, Simon D

AU - Orr, Robin M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Military personnel and firefighters are required to carry occupational loads and complete tasks in hostile and unpredictable environments where a lack of mobility may risk lives. This review critically examines the literature investigating the impacts of load carriage on the mobility of these specialist personnel. Several literature databases, reference lists, and subject matter experts were employed to identify relevant studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critiqued using the Downs and Black protocol. Inter-rater agreement was determined by Cohen's κ. Twelve original research studies, which included male and female participants from military and firefighting occupations, were critiqued (κ = .81). A review of these papers found that as the carried load weight increased, carrier mobility during aerobic tasks (like road marching) and anaerobic tasks (like obstacle course negotiation) decreased. As such, it can be concluded that the load carried by some specialist personnel may increase their occupational risk by reducing their mobility.

AB - Military personnel and firefighters are required to carry occupational loads and complete tasks in hostile and unpredictable environments where a lack of mobility may risk lives. This review critically examines the literature investigating the impacts of load carriage on the mobility of these specialist personnel. Several literature databases, reference lists, and subject matter experts were employed to identify relevant studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critiqued using the Downs and Black protocol. Inter-rater agreement was determined by Cohen's κ. Twelve original research studies, which included male and female participants from military and firefighting occupations, were critiqued (κ = .81). A review of these papers found that as the carried load weight increased, carrier mobility during aerobic tasks (like road marching) and anaerobic tasks (like obstacle course negotiation) decreased. As such, it can be concluded that the load carried by some specialist personnel may increase their occupational risk by reducing their mobility.

U2 - 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077025

DO - 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077025

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 33

EP - 41

JO - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

SN - 1080-3548

IS - 1

ER -