The illusory reference of the transitional state and non-market economy status

Lisa Toohey, Jonathan Crowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transitional economies have steadily become a very substantial portion of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) membership comprising around two-thirds of new members since 1996-and a very large proportion of the States currently negotiating accession, but they have been subject to different and more onerous treatment than their fellow ‘non-transitional’ members. Increasingly, the differential treatment of transitional economies under the WTO regime is causing both generalized conflict and specific WTO disputes. This article argues that designations such as ‘transitional economy’ and ‘non-market economy’ are flawed in the binary approach that they establish in relation to the notion of the market.While they serve useful political objectives for some WTO members, they are unsatisfactory from a legal and theoretical perspective. In the longer term, this is an untenable position and one that should be reconsidered for the sake of transparency within the WTO framework. We conclude that the use of these dichotomies in the WTO context requires reconsideration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-336
Number of pages23
JournalChinese Journal of Comparative Law
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

WTO
economy
political goal
transparency
regime
market

Cite this

@article{bebc92b1358f437bb8c7cff9585c370d,
title = "The illusory reference of the transitional state and non-market economy status",
abstract = "Transitional economies have steadily become a very substantial portion of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) membership comprising around two-thirds of new members since 1996-and a very large proportion of the States currently negotiating accession, but they have been subject to different and more onerous treatment than their fellow ‘non-transitional’ members. Increasingly, the differential treatment of transitional economies under the WTO regime is causing both generalized conflict and specific WTO disputes. This article argues that designations such as ‘transitional economy’ and ‘non-market economy’ are flawed in the binary approach that they establish in relation to the notion of the market.While they serve useful political objectives for some WTO members, they are unsatisfactory from a legal and theoretical perspective. In the longer term, this is an untenable position and one that should be reconsidered for the sake of transparency within the WTO framework. We conclude that the use of these dichotomies in the WTO context requires reconsideration.",
author = "Lisa Toohey and Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/cjcl/cxu004",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "314--336",
journal = "Chinese Journal of Comparative Law",
issn = "2050-4802",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

The illusory reference of the transitional state and non-market economy status. / Toohey, Lisa; Crowe, Jonathan.

In: Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014, p. 314-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The illusory reference of the transitional state and non-market economy status

AU - Toohey, Lisa

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Transitional economies have steadily become a very substantial portion of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) membership comprising around two-thirds of new members since 1996-and a very large proportion of the States currently negotiating accession, but they have been subject to different and more onerous treatment than their fellow ‘non-transitional’ members. Increasingly, the differential treatment of transitional economies under the WTO regime is causing both generalized conflict and specific WTO disputes. This article argues that designations such as ‘transitional economy’ and ‘non-market economy’ are flawed in the binary approach that they establish in relation to the notion of the market.While they serve useful political objectives for some WTO members, they are unsatisfactory from a legal and theoretical perspective. In the longer term, this is an untenable position and one that should be reconsidered for the sake of transparency within the WTO framework. We conclude that the use of these dichotomies in the WTO context requires reconsideration.

AB - Transitional economies have steadily become a very substantial portion of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) membership comprising around two-thirds of new members since 1996-and a very large proportion of the States currently negotiating accession, but they have been subject to different and more onerous treatment than their fellow ‘non-transitional’ members. Increasingly, the differential treatment of transitional economies under the WTO regime is causing both generalized conflict and specific WTO disputes. This article argues that designations such as ‘transitional economy’ and ‘non-market economy’ are flawed in the binary approach that they establish in relation to the notion of the market.While they serve useful political objectives for some WTO members, they are unsatisfactory from a legal and theoretical perspective. In the longer term, this is an untenable position and one that should be reconsidered for the sake of transparency within the WTO framework. We conclude that the use of these dichotomies in the WTO context requires reconsideration.

U2 - 10.1093/cjcl/cxu004

DO - 10.1093/cjcl/cxu004

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 314

EP - 336

JO - Chinese Journal of Comparative Law

JF - Chinese Journal of Comparative Law

SN - 2050-4802

IS - 2

ER -