The Idea of Small Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Talk about social or distributive justice, at least among legal and political philosophers, tends to focus heavily on institutions. This way of thinking about justice owes a great deal to John Rawls. Rawls’s theory of justice was famously criticised by Robert Nozick, who in turn attracted an influential critique from G. A. Cohen. The story of these critiques is well known, but this article tells it in an unfamiliar way. The common theme in Nozick’s and Cohen’s arguments, I contend, is that there is a way of thinking about social justice that focuses not primarily on institutions, but rather on interpersonal relationships. I call this idea small justice. Justice, on this view, is identified with whatever institutions would arise through a process of social evolution from ethical interpersonal dealings repeated consistently over time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-243
JournalRatio Juris
Volume34
Issue number3
Early online date25 Sep 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Idea of Small Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • The Idea of Small Justice

    Crowe, J., 2019.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearch

Cite this