The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, Paul Glasziou, Mai Har Sham, Virginia Barbour, Anne-Marie Coriat, Nicole Foeger, Ulrich Dirnagl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

192 Citations (Scopus)
221 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For knowledge to benefit research and society, it must be trustworthy. Trustworthy research is robust, rigorous, and transparent at all stages of design, execution, and reporting. Assessment of researchers still rarely includes considerations related to trustworthiness, rigor, and transparency. We have developed the Hong Kong Principles (HKPs) as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity with a specific focus on the need to drive research improvement through ensuring that researchers are explicitly recognized and rewarded for behaviors that strengthen research integrity. We present five principles: responsible research practices; transparent reporting; open science (open research); valuing a diversity of types of research; and recognizing all contributions to research and scholarly activity. For each principle, we provide a rationale for its inclusion and provide examples where these principles are already being adopted.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere3000737
Number of pages14
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this