The holy trinity of legal fictions undermining the application of law to the global Internet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The clash between the borderless Internet and the geographically structured legal landscape is almost universally adopted as the starting point for discussions of Internet jurisdiction issues. This clash is important, but to fully appreciate its implications we need to proceed far into the territory of jurisprudence. Here, I draw attention to how three presumptions that underpin all legal systems are stretched beyond their legitimate boundaries where domestic law is applied to the Internet in an extraterritorial manner. The consequences of this are severe and must influence such application of the law. I propose that the goal we should aim at is what can be described as jurisdictional interoperability between the various domestic legal systems that regulate our conduct online. I also show that, in its reliance on 'morality', natural law theory provides Internet users guidance as to which legal rules, within their respective contextual legal systems, they need to abide by.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-234
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

legal usage
legal system
Internet
natural law
jurisprudence
morality
jurisdiction
Law

Cite this

@article{d2f1f4fdb96d4fd3bdd22c5e6b5cb7c7,
title = "The holy trinity of legal fictions undermining the application of law to the global Internet",
abstract = "The clash between the borderless Internet and the geographically structured legal landscape is almost universally adopted as the starting point for discussions of Internet jurisdiction issues. This clash is important, but to fully appreciate its implications we need to proceed far into the territory of jurisprudence. Here, I draw attention to how three presumptions that underpin all legal systems are stretched beyond their legitimate boundaries where domestic law is applied to the Internet in an extraterritorial manner. The consequences of this are severe and must influence such application of the law. I propose that the goal we should aim at is what can be described as jurisdictional interoperability between the various domestic legal systems that regulate our conduct online. I also show that, in its reliance on 'morality', natural law theory provides Internet users guidance as to which legal rules, within their respective contextual legal systems, they need to abide by.",
author = "Dan Svantesson",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/ijlit/eav007",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "219--234",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Information Technology",
issn = "0967-0769",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

The holy trinity of legal fictions undermining the application of law to the global Internet. / Svantesson, Dan.

In: International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2015, p. 219-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The holy trinity of legal fictions undermining the application of law to the global Internet

AU - Svantesson, Dan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The clash between the borderless Internet and the geographically structured legal landscape is almost universally adopted as the starting point for discussions of Internet jurisdiction issues. This clash is important, but to fully appreciate its implications we need to proceed far into the territory of jurisprudence. Here, I draw attention to how three presumptions that underpin all legal systems are stretched beyond their legitimate boundaries where domestic law is applied to the Internet in an extraterritorial manner. The consequences of this are severe and must influence such application of the law. I propose that the goal we should aim at is what can be described as jurisdictional interoperability between the various domestic legal systems that regulate our conduct online. I also show that, in its reliance on 'morality', natural law theory provides Internet users guidance as to which legal rules, within their respective contextual legal systems, they need to abide by.

AB - The clash between the borderless Internet and the geographically structured legal landscape is almost universally adopted as the starting point for discussions of Internet jurisdiction issues. This clash is important, but to fully appreciate its implications we need to proceed far into the territory of jurisprudence. Here, I draw attention to how three presumptions that underpin all legal systems are stretched beyond their legitimate boundaries where domestic law is applied to the Internet in an extraterritorial manner. The consequences of this are severe and must influence such application of the law. I propose that the goal we should aim at is what can be described as jurisdictional interoperability between the various domestic legal systems that regulate our conduct online. I also show that, in its reliance on 'morality', natural law theory provides Internet users guidance as to which legal rules, within their respective contextual legal systems, they need to abide by.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943384222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/eav007

DO - 10.1093/ijlit/eav007

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 219

EP - 234

JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

SN - 0967-0769

IS - 3

ER -