The Google Spain case: Part of a harmful trend of jurisdictional overreach. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/45

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Few legal decisions have gained greater academic and public scrutiny than has the Google Spain case and the facts of this so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ case are widely known. As could be expected, the CJEU’s decision of 2014 is legally technical and addresses a range of topics. Here, I will focus on those aspects of the judgment, and its (suggested) implementation, that has to do with jurisdiction. Those matters must be viewed in their proper context. To that end, this article places the discussion in the context of: (1) the ongoing European data privacy reform, (2) the considerable development of data privacy laws around the globe and (3) the general trend of jurisdictional overreach. Having done so, a Model Code Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Be Forgotten is presented and discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalEUI Working Paper RSCAS
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

search engine
Spain
privacy law
trend
privacy
jurisdiction
reform

Cite this

@article{04d0d0bb89be4bc0a09e16348e79757b,
title = "The Google Spain case: Part of a harmful trend of jurisdictional overreach. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/45",
abstract = "Few legal decisions have gained greater academic and public scrutiny than has the Google Spain case and the facts of this so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ case are widely known. As could be expected, the CJEU’s decision of 2014 is legally technical and addresses a range of topics. Here, I will focus on those aspects of the judgment, and its (suggested) implementation, that has to do with jurisdiction. Those matters must be viewed in their proper context. To that end, this article places the discussion in the context of: (1) the ongoing European data privacy reform, (2) the considerable development of data privacy laws around the globe and (3) the general trend of jurisdictional overreach. Having done so, a Model Code Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Be Forgotten is presented and discussed.",
author = "Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "EUI Working Paper RSCAS",
issn = "1028-3625",

}

The Google Spain case : Part of a harmful trend of jurisdictional overreach. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/45. / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: EUI Working Paper RSCAS, 2015, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Google Spain case

T2 - Part of a harmful trend of jurisdictional overreach. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/45

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Few legal decisions have gained greater academic and public scrutiny than has the Google Spain case and the facts of this so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ case are widely known. As could be expected, the CJEU’s decision of 2014 is legally technical and addresses a range of topics. Here, I will focus on those aspects of the judgment, and its (suggested) implementation, that has to do with jurisdiction. Those matters must be viewed in their proper context. To that end, this article places the discussion in the context of: (1) the ongoing European data privacy reform, (2) the considerable development of data privacy laws around the globe and (3) the general trend of jurisdictional overreach. Having done so, a Model Code Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Be Forgotten is presented and discussed.

AB - Few legal decisions have gained greater academic and public scrutiny than has the Google Spain case and the facts of this so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ case are widely known. As could be expected, the CJEU’s decision of 2014 is legally technical and addresses a range of topics. Here, I will focus on those aspects of the judgment, and its (suggested) implementation, that has to do with jurisdiction. Those matters must be viewed in their proper context. To that end, this article places the discussion in the context of: (1) the ongoing European data privacy reform, (2) the considerable development of data privacy laws around the globe and (3) the general trend of jurisdictional overreach. Having done so, a Model Code Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Be Forgotten is presented and discussed.

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - EUI Working Paper RSCAS

JF - EUI Working Paper RSCAS

SN - 1028-3625

ER -