Abstract
This chapter covers The Fallacy of Accuracy in Criminal Profiling; that is, while accuracy is cited as one yardstick of whether a profile is useful, it may in fact be the worst predictor of the utility of a profile. For example, what happens if a profile is accurate on 10 characteristics, but none of them actually helps police identify any suspect pools? What about in another instance where the profile gives 10 characteristics, is accurate on three of them, and one of those three helps identify a suspect who turns out to be the killer? Which has the right to claim accuracy? Which on utility? These issues are discussed in detail.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues |
| Editors | W Petherick |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Chapter | 6 |
| Pages | 113-124 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Edition | 3rd |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781455731749 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The fallacy of accuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 1 Citations
- 1 Scholarly edition
-
Profiling and serial crime: Theoretical and practical Issues
Petherick, W. (Editor), 2014, 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier. 449 p.Research output: Book/Report › Scholarly edition › Research › peer-review
8 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver