The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. The fallacy of accuracy encompasses two issues which includes actual accuracy and utility. The success of profiling can be defined as the number of hits scored by profiles. This chapter presents a study, which suggested that of the four groups, profilers had the highest mean number of accurate predictions, with the detectives having the second highest, psychologists the third highest, and students the lowest number of mean accurate predictions. The degree to which a profile helps to catch an offender will also be dictated by the case at hand, with the evidence having a considerable impact. It is observed that if a prime suspect has already been identified, or if there is supporting physical evidence, then it may assist in case resolution despite the involvement of a profiler. It is suggested that consideration of how a profile might be used by the end consumer is paramount to utility.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSerial Crime
PublisherElsevier
Pages109-121
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9780123749987
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Hand
Students
Psychology

Cite this

Petherick, Wayne. / The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. Serial Crime. Elsevier, 2009. pp. 109-121
@inbook{686e29fc15734a56afd3646764432973,
title = "The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling",
abstract = "This chapter discusses the fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. The fallacy of accuracy encompasses two issues which includes actual accuracy and utility. The success of profiling can be defined as the number of hits scored by profiles. This chapter presents a study, which suggested that of the four groups, profilers had the highest mean number of accurate predictions, with the detectives having the second highest, psychologists the third highest, and students the lowest number of mean accurate predictions. The degree to which a profile helps to catch an offender will also be dictated by the case at hand, with the evidence having a considerable impact. It is observed that if a prime suspect has already been identified, or if there is supporting physical evidence, then it may assist in case resolution despite the involvement of a profiler. It is suggested that consideration of how a profile might be used by the end consumer is paramount to utility.",
author = "Wayne Petherick",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-374998-7.00005-8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780123749987",
pages = "109--121",
booktitle = "Serial Crime",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",

}

The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. / Petherick, Wayne.

Serial Crime. Elsevier, 2009. p. 109-121.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling

AU - Petherick, Wayne

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This chapter discusses the fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. The fallacy of accuracy encompasses two issues which includes actual accuracy and utility. The success of profiling can be defined as the number of hits scored by profiles. This chapter presents a study, which suggested that of the four groups, profilers had the highest mean number of accurate predictions, with the detectives having the second highest, psychologists the third highest, and students the lowest number of mean accurate predictions. The degree to which a profile helps to catch an offender will also be dictated by the case at hand, with the evidence having a considerable impact. It is observed that if a prime suspect has already been identified, or if there is supporting physical evidence, then it may assist in case resolution despite the involvement of a profiler. It is suggested that consideration of how a profile might be used by the end consumer is paramount to utility.

AB - This chapter discusses the fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. The fallacy of accuracy encompasses two issues which includes actual accuracy and utility. The success of profiling can be defined as the number of hits scored by profiles. This chapter presents a study, which suggested that of the four groups, profilers had the highest mean number of accurate predictions, with the detectives having the second highest, psychologists the third highest, and students the lowest number of mean accurate predictions. The degree to which a profile helps to catch an offender will also be dictated by the case at hand, with the evidence having a considerable impact. It is observed that if a prime suspect has already been identified, or if there is supporting physical evidence, then it may assist in case resolution despite the involvement of a profiler. It is suggested that consideration of how a profile might be used by the end consumer is paramount to utility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869217383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-374998-7.00005-8

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-374998-7.00005-8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780123749987

SP - 109

EP - 121

BT - Serial Crime

PB - Elsevier

ER -