The European Union as a Protector and Promoter of Human Rights

Florentina Benga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

[Extract] It could be argued that the European Union (EU) is the best promoter of human rights in
the entire Europe.113
The arguments rely on the advantages of any regional system and, specifically for the
EU, in its “power” to constraint the possible/future member states to improve human
rights’ protection. Indeed, regions are relatively more homogeneous with respect to
culture, language, and tradition and therefore reaching consensus on the scope and
content of rights is easier than in an ethnically diverse society114. Political consensus is
more forthcoming on both texts and any monitoring/enforcement machinery because
fewer states are involved115. In addition, the first regional human rights developments
occurred in Europe under the auspices of the Council of Europe that constitute another
advantage for the EU’s human rights system development. Yet, all EU’s member states
are members of the Council of Europe and bound by the terms of the European
Convention of Human Rights. Conditionality to respect human rights in order to become
a member is perhaps the most powerful instrument of the EU. It is probably enough to
look at the number of Central and East European Countries (CEECs) that have joined the
EU in 2004116.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-39
Number of pages10
JournalContemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review
Issue number34
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

human rights
Council of Europe
respect
state machinery
EU
system development
monitoring
language

Cite this

@article{cd28baa376604a93bfc89d32402d2486,
title = "The European Union as a Protector and Promoter of Human Rights",
abstract = "[Extract] It could be argued that the European Union (EU) is the best promoter of human rights inthe entire Europe.113The arguments rely on the advantages of any regional system and, specifically for theEU, in its “power” to constraint the possible/future member states to improve humanrights’ protection. Indeed, regions are relatively more homogeneous with respect toculture, language, and tradition and therefore reaching consensus on the scope andcontent of rights is easier than in an ethnically diverse society114. Political consensus ismore forthcoming on both texts and any monitoring/enforcement machinery becausefewer states are involved115. In addition, the first regional human rights developmentsoccurred in Europe under the auspices of the Council of Europe that constitute anotheradvantage for the EU’s human rights system development. Yet, all EU’s member statesare members of the Council of Europe and bound by the terms of the EuropeanConvention of Human Rights. Conditionality to respect human rights in order to becomea member is perhaps the most powerful instrument of the EU. It is probably enough tolook at the number of Central and East European Countries (CEECs) that have joined theEU in 2004116.",
author = "Florentina Benga",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
language = "English",
pages = "30--39",
journal = "Contemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review",
issn = "1441-0052",
number = "34",

}

The European Union as a Protector and Promoter of Human Rights. / Benga, Florentina.

In: Contemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review, No. 34, 08.2006, p. 30-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European Union as a Protector and Promoter of Human Rights

AU - Benga, Florentina

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - [Extract] It could be argued that the European Union (EU) is the best promoter of human rights inthe entire Europe.113The arguments rely on the advantages of any regional system and, specifically for theEU, in its “power” to constraint the possible/future member states to improve humanrights’ protection. Indeed, regions are relatively more homogeneous with respect toculture, language, and tradition and therefore reaching consensus on the scope andcontent of rights is easier than in an ethnically diverse society114. Political consensus ismore forthcoming on both texts and any monitoring/enforcement machinery becausefewer states are involved115. In addition, the first regional human rights developmentsoccurred in Europe under the auspices of the Council of Europe that constitute anotheradvantage for the EU’s human rights system development. Yet, all EU’s member statesare members of the Council of Europe and bound by the terms of the EuropeanConvention of Human Rights. Conditionality to respect human rights in order to becomea member is perhaps the most powerful instrument of the EU. It is probably enough tolook at the number of Central and East European Countries (CEECs) that have joined theEU in 2004116.

AB - [Extract] It could be argued that the European Union (EU) is the best promoter of human rights inthe entire Europe.113The arguments rely on the advantages of any regional system and, specifically for theEU, in its “power” to constraint the possible/future member states to improve humanrights’ protection. Indeed, regions are relatively more homogeneous with respect toculture, language, and tradition and therefore reaching consensus on the scope andcontent of rights is easier than in an ethnically diverse society114. Political consensus ismore forthcoming on both texts and any monitoring/enforcement machinery becausefewer states are involved115. In addition, the first regional human rights developmentsoccurred in Europe under the auspices of the Council of Europe that constitute anotheradvantage for the EU’s human rights system development. Yet, all EU’s member statesare members of the Council of Europe and bound by the terms of the EuropeanConvention of Human Rights. Conditionality to respect human rights in order to becomea member is perhaps the most powerful instrument of the EU. It is probably enough tolook at the number of Central and East European Countries (CEECs) that have joined theEU in 2004116.

M3 - Article

SP - 30

EP - 39

JO - Contemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review

JF - Contemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review

SN - 1441-0052

IS - 34

ER -