The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)
224 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although cadavers constitute the gold standard for teaching anatomy to medical and health science students, there are substantial financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on their use. In addition, although anatomy remains one of the fundamental areas of medical education, universities have decreased the hours allocated to teaching gross anatomy in favor of applied clinical work. The release of virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) devices allows learning to occur through hands-on immersive experiences. The aim of this research was to assess whether learning structural anatomy utilizing VR or AR is as effective as tablet-based (TB) applications, and whether these modes allowed enhanced student learning, engagement and performance. Participants (n=59) were randomly allocated to one of the three learning modes: VR, AR, or TB and completed a lesson on skull anatomy, after which they completed an anatomical knowledge assessment. Student perceptions of each learning mode and any adverse effects experienced were recorded. No significant differences were found between mean assessment scores in VR, AR, or TB. During the lessons however, VR participants were more likely to exhibit adverse effects such as headaches (25% in VR P<0.05), dizziness (40% in VR, P<0.001), or blurred vision (35% in VR, P<0.01). Both VR and AR are as valuable for teaching anatomy as tablet devices, but also promote intrinsic benefits such as increased learner immersion and engagement. These outcomes show great promise for the effective use of virtual and augmented reality as means to supplement lesson content in anatomical education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-559
Number of pages11
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Tablets
Learning
Health
Teaching
Students
Equipment and Supplies
Dizziness
Immersion
Medical Education
Cadaver
Skull
Headache
Education
Research

Cite this

@article{d761ced844064a5eae3f01862a09a36e,
title = "The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy",
abstract = "Although cadavers constitute the gold standard for teaching anatomy to medical and health science students, there are substantial financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on their use. In addition, although anatomy remains one of the fundamental areas of medical education, universities have decreased the hours allocated to teaching gross anatomy in favor of applied clinical work. The release of virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) devices allows learning to occur through hands-on immersive experiences. The aim of this research was to assess whether learning structural anatomy utilizing VR or AR is as effective as tablet-based (TB) applications, and whether these modes allowed enhanced student learning, engagement and performance. Participants (n=59) were randomly allocated to one of the three learning modes: VR, AR, or TB and completed a lesson on skull anatomy, after which they completed an anatomical knowledge assessment. Student perceptions of each learning mode and any adverse effects experienced were recorded. No significant differences were found between mean assessment scores in VR, AR, or TB. During the lessons however, VR participants were more likely to exhibit adverse effects such as headaches (25{\%} in VR P<0.05), dizziness (40{\%} in VR, P<0.001), or blurred vision (35{\%} in VR, P<0.01). Both VR and AR are as valuable for teaching anatomy as tablet devices, but also promote intrinsic benefits such as increased learner immersion and engagement. These outcomes show great promise for the effective use of virtual and augmented reality as means to supplement lesson content in anatomical education.",
author = "Christian Moro and Zane Štromberga and Athanasios Raikos and Allan Stirling",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ase.1696",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "549--559",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "6",

}

The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. / Moro, Christian; Štromberga, Zane; Raikos, Athanasios; Stirling, Allan.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 549-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy

AU - Moro, Christian

AU - Štromberga, Zane

AU - Raikos, Athanasios

AU - Stirling, Allan

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Although cadavers constitute the gold standard for teaching anatomy to medical and health science students, there are substantial financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on their use. In addition, although anatomy remains one of the fundamental areas of medical education, universities have decreased the hours allocated to teaching gross anatomy in favor of applied clinical work. The release of virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) devices allows learning to occur through hands-on immersive experiences. The aim of this research was to assess whether learning structural anatomy utilizing VR or AR is as effective as tablet-based (TB) applications, and whether these modes allowed enhanced student learning, engagement and performance. Participants (n=59) were randomly allocated to one of the three learning modes: VR, AR, or TB and completed a lesson on skull anatomy, after which they completed an anatomical knowledge assessment. Student perceptions of each learning mode and any adverse effects experienced were recorded. No significant differences were found between mean assessment scores in VR, AR, or TB. During the lessons however, VR participants were more likely to exhibit adverse effects such as headaches (25% in VR P<0.05), dizziness (40% in VR, P<0.001), or blurred vision (35% in VR, P<0.01). Both VR and AR are as valuable for teaching anatomy as tablet devices, but also promote intrinsic benefits such as increased learner immersion and engagement. These outcomes show great promise for the effective use of virtual and augmented reality as means to supplement lesson content in anatomical education.

AB - Although cadavers constitute the gold standard for teaching anatomy to medical and health science students, there are substantial financial, ethical, and supervisory constraints on their use. In addition, although anatomy remains one of the fundamental areas of medical education, universities have decreased the hours allocated to teaching gross anatomy in favor of applied clinical work. The release of virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) devices allows learning to occur through hands-on immersive experiences. The aim of this research was to assess whether learning structural anatomy utilizing VR or AR is as effective as tablet-based (TB) applications, and whether these modes allowed enhanced student learning, engagement and performance. Participants (n=59) were randomly allocated to one of the three learning modes: VR, AR, or TB and completed a lesson on skull anatomy, after which they completed an anatomical knowledge assessment. Student perceptions of each learning mode and any adverse effects experienced were recorded. No significant differences were found between mean assessment scores in VR, AR, or TB. During the lessons however, VR participants were more likely to exhibit adverse effects such as headaches (25% in VR P<0.05), dizziness (40% in VR, P<0.001), or blurred vision (35% in VR, P<0.01). Both VR and AR are as valuable for teaching anatomy as tablet devices, but also promote intrinsic benefits such as increased learner immersion and engagement. These outcomes show great promise for the effective use of virtual and augmented reality as means to supplement lesson content in anatomical education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018611211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.1696

DO - 10.1002/ase.1696

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 549

EP - 559

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 6

ER -