TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music
AU - Prince, Jon B.
AU - Schmuckler, Mark A.
AU - Thompson, William F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada to W.F.T. and M.A.S. supported this research.
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - Musical pitch-time relations were explored by investigating the effect of temporal variation on pitch perception. In Experiment 1, trained musicians heard a standard tone followed by a tonal context and then a comparison tone. They then performed one of two tasks. In the cognitive task, they indicated whether the comparison tone was in the key of the context. In the perceptual task, they judged whether the comparison tone was higher or lower than the standard tone. For both tasks, the comparison tone occurred early, on time, or late with respect to temporal expectancies established by the context. Temporal variation did not affect accuracy in either task. Experiment 2 used the perceptual task and varied the pitch structure by employing either a tonal or an atonal context. Temporal variation did not affect accuracy for tonal contexts, but did for atonal contexts. Experiment 3 replicated these results and controlled potential confounds. We argue that tonal contexts bias attention toward pitch and eliminate effects of temporal variation, whereas atonal contexts do not, thus fostering pitch-time interactions.
AB - Musical pitch-time relations were explored by investigating the effect of temporal variation on pitch perception. In Experiment 1, trained musicians heard a standard tone followed by a tonal context and then a comparison tone. They then performed one of two tasks. In the cognitive task, they indicated whether the comparison tone was in the key of the context. In the perceptual task, they judged whether the comparison tone was higher or lower than the standard tone. For both tasks, the comparison tone occurred early, on time, or late with respect to temporal expectancies established by the context. Temporal variation did not affect accuracy in either task. Experiment 2 used the perceptual task and varied the pitch structure by employing either a tonal or an atonal context. Temporal variation did not affect accuracy for tonal contexts, but did for atonal contexts. Experiment 3 replicated these results and controlled potential confounds. We argue that tonal contexts bias attention toward pitch and eliminate effects of temporal variation, whereas atonal contexts do not, thus fostering pitch-time interactions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65549141261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/MC.37.3.368
DO - 10.3758/MC.37.3.368
M3 - Article
C2 - 19246351
AN - SCOPUS:65549141261
SN - 0090-502X
VL - 37
SP - 368
EP - 381
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
IS - 3
ER -