The Deafening Silence of the Korean Comfort Women: A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray

Constance Youngwon Lee, Jonathan Crowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article reflects upon the continuing historical denialism concerning the Korean "comfort women" forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. We argue that the refusal of the Japanese government and others to squarely confront this wrong is made possible through the exploitation of a différend in Jean-François Lyotard's sense of the term. The différend arises from a complex set of social, cultural, and legal sources, including patriarchal, colonial, and nationalistic constructions of the wrong and its victims. We seek to tentatively expose the nature of the différend by identifying these factors. We then sketch the beginnings of a possible response, drawing on Luce Irigaray's strategy of emphasizing sexual difference and separation to pave the way for reciprocality between the sexes. The testimonies of the "comfort women" must be allowed to speak for themselves before a response can emerge based in other discourses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-356
Number of pages18
JournalAsian Journal of Law and Society
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

slavery
testimony
World War II
exploitation
Military
discourse

Cite this

@article{610ba49d075e451fb41f2babf4420476,
title = "The Deafening Silence of the Korean Comfort Women: A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray",
abstract = "This article reflects upon the continuing historical denialism concerning the Korean {"}comfort women{"} forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. We argue that the refusal of the Japanese government and others to squarely confront this wrong is made possible through the exploitation of a diff{\'e}rend in Jean-Fran{\cc}ois Lyotard's sense of the term. The diff{\'e}rend arises from a complex set of social, cultural, and legal sources, including patriarchal, colonial, and nationalistic constructions of the wrong and its victims. We seek to tentatively expose the nature of the diff{\'e}rend by identifying these factors. We then sketch the beginnings of a possible response, drawing on Luce Irigaray's strategy of emphasizing sexual difference and separation to pave the way for reciprocality between the sexes. The testimonies of the {"}comfort women{"} must be allowed to speak for themselves before a response can emerge based in other discourses.",
author = "Lee, {Constance Youngwon} and Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/als.2015.9",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "339--356",
journal = "Asian Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "2052-9015",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The Deafening Silence of the Korean Comfort Women : A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray. / Lee, Constance Youngwon; Crowe, Jonathan.

In: Asian Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.07.2015, p. 339-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Deafening Silence of the Korean Comfort Women

T2 - A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray

AU - Lee, Constance Youngwon

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - This article reflects upon the continuing historical denialism concerning the Korean "comfort women" forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. We argue that the refusal of the Japanese government and others to squarely confront this wrong is made possible through the exploitation of a différend in Jean-François Lyotard's sense of the term. The différend arises from a complex set of social, cultural, and legal sources, including patriarchal, colonial, and nationalistic constructions of the wrong and its victims. We seek to tentatively expose the nature of the différend by identifying these factors. We then sketch the beginnings of a possible response, drawing on Luce Irigaray's strategy of emphasizing sexual difference and separation to pave the way for reciprocality between the sexes. The testimonies of the "comfort women" must be allowed to speak for themselves before a response can emerge based in other discourses.

AB - This article reflects upon the continuing historical denialism concerning the Korean "comfort women" forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. We argue that the refusal of the Japanese government and others to squarely confront this wrong is made possible through the exploitation of a différend in Jean-François Lyotard's sense of the term. The différend arises from a complex set of social, cultural, and legal sources, including patriarchal, colonial, and nationalistic constructions of the wrong and its victims. We seek to tentatively expose the nature of the différend by identifying these factors. We then sketch the beginnings of a possible response, drawing on Luce Irigaray's strategy of emphasizing sexual difference and separation to pave the way for reciprocality between the sexes. The testimonies of the "comfort women" must be allowed to speak for themselves before a response can emerge based in other discourses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944319931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/als.2015.9

DO - 10.1017/als.2015.9

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 339

EP - 356

JO - Asian Journal of Law and Society

JF - Asian Journal of Law and Society

SN - 2052-9015

IS - 2

ER -