The data protection credibility crisis

Christopher Kuner, Fred H Cate, Christopher Millard, Dan Jerker B Svantesson, Orla Lynskey

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci once wrote (in translation) that ‘the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’.1 Although Gramsci was not speaking about data privacy, it seems to us that this statement could apply to the current state of data protection regulation around the world, which is marked by a realization that existing regulatory models are not working effectively, the lack of political will to explore alternatives, and general frustration about how to improve the situation. This has led to a credibility gap between the objectives of data protection law and how personal data are protected in practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-162
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Data Privacy Law
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

data protection
credibility
personal data
frustration
dying
privacy
speaking
regulation
Law
lack

Cite this

Kuner, Christopher ; Cate, Fred H ; Millard, Christopher ; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B ; Lynskey, Orla. / The data protection credibility crisis. In: International Data Privacy Law. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 161-162.
@article{6c5259b7e4644c9ab335f57395c3f982,
title = "The data protection credibility crisis",
abstract = "The Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci once wrote (in translation) that ‘the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’.1 Although Gramsci was not speaking about data privacy, it seems to us that this statement could apply to the current state of data protection regulation around the world, which is marked by a realization that existing regulatory models are not working effectively, the lack of political will to explore alternatives, and general frustration about how to improve the situation. This has led to a credibility gap between the objectives of data protection law and how personal data are protected in practice.",
author = "Christopher Kuner and Cate, {Fred H} and Christopher Millard and Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B} and Orla Lynskey",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1093/idpl/ipv012",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "161--162",
journal = "International Data Privacy Law",
issn = "2044-3994",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Kuner, C, Cate, FH, Millard, C, Svantesson, DJB & Lynskey, O 2015, 'The data protection credibility crisis' International Data Privacy Law, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 161-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipv012

The data protection credibility crisis. / Kuner, Christopher; Cate, Fred H; Millard, Christopher; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B; Lynskey, Orla.

In: International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, 06.07.2015, p. 161-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - The data protection credibility crisis

AU - Kuner, Christopher

AU - Cate, Fred H

AU - Millard, Christopher

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

AU - Lynskey, Orla

PY - 2015/7/6

Y1 - 2015/7/6

N2 - The Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci once wrote (in translation) that ‘the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’.1 Although Gramsci was not speaking about data privacy, it seems to us that this statement could apply to the current state of data protection regulation around the world, which is marked by a realization that existing regulatory models are not working effectively, the lack of political will to explore alternatives, and general frustration about how to improve the situation. This has led to a credibility gap between the objectives of data protection law and how personal data are protected in practice.

AB - The Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci once wrote (in translation) that ‘the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’.1 Although Gramsci was not speaking about data privacy, it seems to us that this statement could apply to the current state of data protection regulation around the world, which is marked by a realization that existing regulatory models are not working effectively, the lack of political will to explore alternatives, and general frustration about how to improve the situation. This has led to a credibility gap between the objectives of data protection law and how personal data are protected in practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038096537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/idpl/ipv012

DO - 10.1093/idpl/ipv012

M3 - Editorial

VL - 5

SP - 161

EP - 162

JO - International Data Privacy Law

JF - International Data Privacy Law

SN - 2044-3994

IS - 3

ER -