The crystallisation of general assembly space declarations into customary international law

Ricky J. Lee*, Steven R. Freeland

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current instruments of international space law include the United Nations space treaties and the declarations made by the General Assembly on both general and specific issues of space law. Along with other General Assembly resolutions, the exact nature and effect of the space declarations in the context of general international law remain somewhat controversial. It is generally accepted, however, that a provision of a General Assembly resolution or declaration may be regarded as customary international law if it has codified an existing customary principle or has crystallised into customary law through state practice and opinio juris. This paper analyses the provisions of the General Assembly declarations and assesses their current status in the context of customary international law. In particular, it discusses the specific provisions of the declarations concerning remote sensing, direct television broadcasting and nuclear power sources and their effect as customary principles.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law
Place of PublicationBremen, Germany
Number of pages9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes
Event46th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space - Bremen, Germany
Duration: 29 Sept 20033 Oct 2003

Conference

Conference46th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityBremen
Period29/09/033/10/03

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The crystallisation of general assembly space declarations into customary international law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this