The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems: An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations

Dane Miller, Jeung-Hwan Doh, Kriengsak Panuwatwanich, Niek van Oers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The construction industry provides extensive impacts to the environment with population increases further driving these pressures. In an attempt to mitigate these impacts, the industry as a whole has promoted and developed numerous green building rating systems (GBRS). These GBRS assign scores to buildings based on a variety of assessment criteria to determine a structures environmental impact. Previous research has identified shortfalls in certain areas related to these GBRS. In order to gain further insight into these systems an industry survey was conducted to establish an alternate perspective. The outcomes of this survey were consistent with that of previous research, identifying the requirement for an increase in the Embodied Energy (EE) consideration of structures in GBRS. The average estimation of the contribution of EE to a structures life cycle consumption was 28.4%. The survey findings also identified a number of other key areas through which changes in the consideration of sustainable development could be improved. The use of these findings and their comparison to previous research outcomes would assist in the development of supplementary mechanisms to improve the assessment of the environmental performance of structures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-48
Number of pages10
JournalSustainable Cities and Society
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{61a208347f9d4bfba6f31988ff4a91f5,
title = "The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems: An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations",
abstract = "The construction industry provides extensive impacts to the environment with population increases further driving these pressures. In an attempt to mitigate these impacts, the industry as a whole has promoted and developed numerous green building rating systems (GBRS). These GBRS assign scores to buildings based on a variety of assessment criteria to determine a structures environmental impact. Previous research has identified shortfalls in certain areas related to these GBRS. In order to gain further insight into these systems an industry survey was conducted to establish an alternate perspective. The outcomes of this survey were consistent with that of previous research, identifying the requirement for an increase in the Embodied Energy (EE) consideration of structures in GBRS. The average estimation of the contribution of EE to a structures life cycle consumption was 28.4{\%}. The survey findings also identified a number of other key areas through which changes in the consideration of sustainable development could be improved. The use of these findings and their comparison to previous research outcomes would assist in the development of supplementary mechanisms to improve the assessment of the environmental performance of structures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "Dane Miller and Jeung-Hwan Doh and Kriengsak Panuwatwanich and {van Oers}, Niek",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "39--48",
journal = "Sustainable Cities and Society",
issn = "2210-6707",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems : An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations. / Miller, Dane; Doh, Jeung-Hwan; Panuwatwanich, Kriengsak; van Oers, Niek.

In: Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 16, 08.2015, p. 39-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems

T2 - An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations

AU - Miller, Dane

AU - Doh, Jeung-Hwan

AU - Panuwatwanich, Kriengsak

AU - van Oers, Niek

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - The construction industry provides extensive impacts to the environment with population increases further driving these pressures. In an attempt to mitigate these impacts, the industry as a whole has promoted and developed numerous green building rating systems (GBRS). These GBRS assign scores to buildings based on a variety of assessment criteria to determine a structures environmental impact. Previous research has identified shortfalls in certain areas related to these GBRS. In order to gain further insight into these systems an industry survey was conducted to establish an alternate perspective. The outcomes of this survey were consistent with that of previous research, identifying the requirement for an increase in the Embodied Energy (EE) consideration of structures in GBRS. The average estimation of the contribution of EE to a structures life cycle consumption was 28.4%. The survey findings also identified a number of other key areas through which changes in the consideration of sustainable development could be improved. The use of these findings and their comparison to previous research outcomes would assist in the development of supplementary mechanisms to improve the assessment of the environmental performance of structures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The construction industry provides extensive impacts to the environment with population increases further driving these pressures. In an attempt to mitigate these impacts, the industry as a whole has promoted and developed numerous green building rating systems (GBRS). These GBRS assign scores to buildings based on a variety of assessment criteria to determine a structures environmental impact. Previous research has identified shortfalls in certain areas related to these GBRS. In order to gain further insight into these systems an industry survey was conducted to establish an alternate perspective. The outcomes of this survey were consistent with that of previous research, identifying the requirement for an increase in the Embodied Energy (EE) consideration of structures in GBRS. The average estimation of the contribution of EE to a structures life cycle consumption was 28.4%. The survey findings also identified a number of other key areas through which changes in the consideration of sustainable development could be improved. The use of these findings and their comparison to previous research outcomes would assist in the development of supplementary mechanisms to improve the assessment of the environmental performance of structures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927920211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.003

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 39

EP - 48

JO - Sustainable Cities and Society

JF - Sustainable Cities and Society

SN - 2210-6707

ER -