The Compensation Catapult

John Sheehan, Jasper Brown

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Australian property law has steadily evolved to facilitate the
recognition of new or previously unrecognised property rights.
As the scope of the law has widened, modern property rights have
become increasingly complex. One of the most famous Australian
cases, Mabo v.State of Queensland (1992)175 CLR 1 resulted in the
acknowledgement of a whole class of property rights that were not
previously recognised - native title.More recently, the Australian
High Court decision Commonwealth of Australia v. Yarmirr
(2001) 208 CLR 1; 184 ALR 113 furthered our understanding
of property rights to include the notion of ‘’sea country’’. This
evolution of property rights has had fundamental implications
when addressing compensation for the impairment or acquisition
of land by government. We argue that as our understanding of
property rights advances, the ambit of compensation is catapulted
into unchartered waters. This paper highlights the difficulty
of containing property rights to a particular set of descriptors
and the effect this has on compensation claims. Further, this
paper argues that the methodology of processing compensation
claims exposes a disconnect between the public and the NSW
government.Finally, through an exploration of specfic examples
of compensation for interference with private property by
government, this paper concludes that there is a need for a
workable consensus on good, bad, and fair compensation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages89
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018
EventThe 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property : Migrations – Impacts, Law and Spatial Planning - University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Duration: 19 Feb 201823 Feb 2018
Conference number: 12th
http://www.plpr2018.uns.ac.rs/

Conference

ConferenceThe 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property
Abbreviated titlePLPR
CountrySerbia
CityNovi Sad
Period19/02/1823/02/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

right of ownership
private property
Law
court decision
interference
water
methodology

Cite this

Sheehan, J., & Brown, J. (2018). The Compensation Catapult. 89. Abstract from The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property , Novi Sad, Serbia.
Sheehan, John ; Brown, Jasper. / The Compensation Catapult. Abstract from The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property , Novi Sad, Serbia.1 p.
@conference{8e6e346e2c5243a9a6ba474824ef8de1,
title = "The Compensation Catapult",
abstract = "Australian property law has steadily evolved to facilitate therecognition of new or previously unrecognised property rights.As the scope of the law has widened, modern property rights havebecome increasingly complex. One of the most famous Australiancases, Mabo v.State of Queensland (1992)175 CLR 1 resulted in theacknowledgement of a whole class of property rights that were notpreviously recognised - native title.More recently, the AustralianHigh Court decision Commonwealth of Australia v. Yarmirr(2001) 208 CLR 1; 184 ALR 113 furthered our understandingof property rights to include the notion of ‘’sea country’’. Thisevolution of property rights has had fundamental implicationswhen addressing compensation for the impairment or acquisitionof land by government. We argue that as our understanding ofproperty rights advances, the ambit of compensation is catapultedinto unchartered waters. This paper highlights the difficultyof containing property rights to a particular set of descriptorsand the effect this has on compensation claims. Further, thispaper argues that the methodology of processing compensationclaims exposes a disconnect between the public and the NSWgovernment.Finally, through an exploration of specfic examplesof compensation for interference with private property bygovernment, this paper concludes that there is a need for aworkable consensus on good, bad, and fair compensation.",
author = "John Sheehan and Jasper Brown",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
language = "English",
pages = "89",
note = "The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property : Migrations – Impacts, Law and Spatial Planning, PLPR ; Conference date: 19-02-2018 Through 23-02-2018",
url = "http://www.plpr2018.uns.ac.rs/",

}

Sheehan, J & Brown, J 2018, 'The Compensation Catapult' The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property , Novi Sad, Serbia, 19/02/18 - 23/02/18, pp. 89.

The Compensation Catapult. / Sheehan, John; Brown, Jasper.

2018. 89 Abstract from The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property , Novi Sad, Serbia.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - The Compensation Catapult

AU - Sheehan, John

AU - Brown, Jasper

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Australian property law has steadily evolved to facilitate therecognition of new or previously unrecognised property rights.As the scope of the law has widened, modern property rights havebecome increasingly complex. One of the most famous Australiancases, Mabo v.State of Queensland (1992)175 CLR 1 resulted in theacknowledgement of a whole class of property rights that were notpreviously recognised - native title.More recently, the AustralianHigh Court decision Commonwealth of Australia v. Yarmirr(2001) 208 CLR 1; 184 ALR 113 furthered our understandingof property rights to include the notion of ‘’sea country’’. Thisevolution of property rights has had fundamental implicationswhen addressing compensation for the impairment or acquisitionof land by government. We argue that as our understanding ofproperty rights advances, the ambit of compensation is catapultedinto unchartered waters. This paper highlights the difficultyof containing property rights to a particular set of descriptorsand the effect this has on compensation claims. Further, thispaper argues that the methodology of processing compensationclaims exposes a disconnect between the public and the NSWgovernment.Finally, through an exploration of specfic examplesof compensation for interference with private property bygovernment, this paper concludes that there is a need for aworkable consensus on good, bad, and fair compensation.

AB - Australian property law has steadily evolved to facilitate therecognition of new or previously unrecognised property rights.As the scope of the law has widened, modern property rights havebecome increasingly complex. One of the most famous Australiancases, Mabo v.State of Queensland (1992)175 CLR 1 resulted in theacknowledgement of a whole class of property rights that were notpreviously recognised - native title.More recently, the AustralianHigh Court decision Commonwealth of Australia v. Yarmirr(2001) 208 CLR 1; 184 ALR 113 furthered our understandingof property rights to include the notion of ‘’sea country’’. Thisevolution of property rights has had fundamental implicationswhen addressing compensation for the impairment or acquisitionof land by government. We argue that as our understanding ofproperty rights advances, the ambit of compensation is catapultedinto unchartered waters. This paper highlights the difficultyof containing property rights to a particular set of descriptorsand the effect this has on compensation claims. Further, thispaper argues that the methodology of processing compensationclaims exposes a disconnect between the public and the NSWgovernment.Finally, through an exploration of specfic examplesof compensation for interference with private property bygovernment, this paper concludes that there is a need for aworkable consensus on good, bad, and fair compensation.

M3 - Abstract

SP - 89

ER -

Sheehan J, Brown J. The Compensation Catapult. 2018. Abstract from The 12th Annual Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property , Novi Sad, Serbia.