The comparative dimension regarding approaches to decision-making in international tax arbitration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter will outline the evolution of international tax dispute mechanisms with respect to the slow and cumbersome progress towards the acceptance of mandatory binding arbitration as a means of resolving contentious issues. This evolution will be viewed mainly through the prism of the Conventions designed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and by the United Nations, as these are arguably the two most influential and inspirational sources regarding the design of tax treaty arbitration provisions. However, other instruments will also be discussed in order to provide a comparative perspective on emerging global attitudes towards arbitration. This chapter will also comparatively consider the two main arbitration methodologies currently employed in the international tax arena.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScholarship, practice and education in comparative law
Subtitle of host publicationA festschrift in honour of Mary Hiscock
EditorsJohn Farrar, Vai Lo, Goh Bee Chen
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherSpringer
Chapter7
Pages115-135
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)978-981-13-9246-7
ISBN (Print)978-981-13-9245-0
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Oct 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The comparative dimension regarding approaches to decision-making in international tax arbitration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Activities

    • 1 Oral presentation

    Cite this

    Markham, M. (2019). The comparative dimension regarding approaches to decision-making in international tax arbitration. In J. Farrar, V. Lo, & G. Bee Chen (Eds.), Scholarship, practice and education in comparative law: A festschrift in honour of Mary Hiscock (pp. 115-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9246-7_7