The characteristics making Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation: What every international jurist should know about the Internet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to determine why certain forms of Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation, we must identify which characteristics make them different to other forms of communication. Focusing on conflict of laws, it is submitted that regard must be had to the characteristics of borderlessness, geographical independence, limited language dependence, one-to-many communication, low threshold information distribution, widely used, portability, lack of reliable geographical identifiers, reactive nature, lack of central control and convergence. These characteristics cause an imbalance between the ease of cross-border contacts on the one hand, and the difficulty of solving cross-border disputes on the other. Furthermore, certain conflict of laws rules have lost their logical bases, and those active on the Internet may lack notice of the applicable law and which forums they are exposed to. In addition, the existing gap between reasonable grounds for jurisdictional claims and reasonable grounds for recognition and enforcement has been widened.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-69
Number of pages31
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

jurist
Internet
regulation
communication
lack
Law
constitutional state
contact
cause
language

Cite this

@article{5570ba49c13346729ad61e254de41ae2,
title = "The characteristics making Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation: What every international jurist should know about the Internet",
abstract = "In order to determine why certain forms of Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation, we must identify which characteristics make them different to other forms of communication. Focusing on conflict of laws, it is submitted that regard must be had to the characteristics of borderlessness, geographical independence, limited language dependence, one-to-many communication, low threshold information distribution, widely used, portability, lack of reliable geographical identifiers, reactive nature, lack of central control and convergence. These characteristics cause an imbalance between the ease of cross-border contacts on the one hand, and the difficulty of solving cross-border disputes on the other. Furthermore, certain conflict of laws rules have lost their logical bases, and those active on the Internet may lack notice of the applicable law and which forums they are exposed to. In addition, the existing gap between reasonable grounds for jurisdictional claims and reasonable grounds for recognition and enforcement has been widened.",
author = "Svantesson, {D. J B}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/ijlit/eai002",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "39--69",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Information Technology",
issn = "0967-0769",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The characteristics making Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation

T2 - What every international jurist should know about the Internet

AU - Svantesson, D. J B

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In order to determine why certain forms of Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation, we must identify which characteristics make them different to other forms of communication. Focusing on conflict of laws, it is submitted that regard must be had to the characteristics of borderlessness, geographical independence, limited language dependence, one-to-many communication, low threshold information distribution, widely used, portability, lack of reliable geographical identifiers, reactive nature, lack of central control and convergence. These characteristics cause an imbalance between the ease of cross-border contacts on the one hand, and the difficulty of solving cross-border disputes on the other. Furthermore, certain conflict of laws rules have lost their logical bases, and those active on the Internet may lack notice of the applicable law and which forums they are exposed to. In addition, the existing gap between reasonable grounds for jurisdictional claims and reasonable grounds for recognition and enforcement has been widened.

AB - In order to determine why certain forms of Internet communication challenge traditional models of regulation, we must identify which characteristics make them different to other forms of communication. Focusing on conflict of laws, it is submitted that regard must be had to the characteristics of borderlessness, geographical independence, limited language dependence, one-to-many communication, low threshold information distribution, widely used, portability, lack of reliable geographical identifiers, reactive nature, lack of central control and convergence. These characteristics cause an imbalance between the ease of cross-border contacts on the one hand, and the difficulty of solving cross-border disputes on the other. Furthermore, certain conflict of laws rules have lost their logical bases, and those active on the Internet may lack notice of the applicable law and which forums they are exposed to. In addition, the existing gap between reasonable grounds for jurisdictional claims and reasonable grounds for recognition and enforcement has been widened.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24144480047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/eai002

DO - 10.1093/ijlit/eai002

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 39

EP - 69

JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology

SN - 0967-0769

IS - 1

ER -