The challenge of balancing methodological research rigour and practical needs in low-income setttings: What we are doing and what we need to do better

M. Cardona, R. Joshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A roundtable discussion was held with 29 experienced Public Health researchers and policy makers from 9 countries at an international conference in Australia. Their experiences were discussed about establishing and maintaining research projects and health programs in developing countries. This paper aims to (1) Highlight methodological issues relevant to the conduct of research and development in low income settings as discussed at the roundtable; (2) List the main barriers in implementing research and project initiatives in low-income settings; and (3) present recommendations for meeting researchers' needs across cultures without jeopardising methodological rigour. Lessons learnt on barriers for the conduct of methodologically sound research were classified in four domains: investigator factors, community factors, strategic factors and methodological factors. Proposed solutions emerged in the areas of strategic guidelines, attitudinal changes and methodological approaches. Practical solutions to individual and systematic barriers were also suggested. It is hoped that these recommendations will influence current practice and assist other researchers in preparing and undertaking appropriate research methods and health program delivery strategies in low-income settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-89
Number of pages9
JournalCritical Public Health
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Research
Health
Public Policy
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Developing Countries
Public Health
Guidelines

Cite this

@article{0752ceb6a54b4588a3eff7767ffd2bf0,
title = "The challenge of balancing methodological research rigour and practical needs in low-income setttings: What we are doing and what we need to do better",
abstract = "A roundtable discussion was held with 29 experienced Public Health researchers and policy makers from 9 countries at an international conference in Australia. Their experiences were discussed about establishing and maintaining research projects and health programs in developing countries. This paper aims to (1) Highlight methodological issues relevant to the conduct of research and development in low income settings as discussed at the roundtable; (2) List the main barriers in implementing research and project initiatives in low-income settings; and (3) present recommendations for meeting researchers' needs across cultures without jeopardising methodological rigour. Lessons learnt on barriers for the conduct of methodologically sound research were classified in four domains: investigator factors, community factors, strategic factors and methodological factors. Proposed solutions emerged in the areas of strategic guidelines, attitudinal changes and methodological approaches. Practical solutions to individual and systematic barriers were also suggested. It is hoped that these recommendations will influence current practice and assist other researchers in preparing and undertaking appropriate research methods and health program delivery strategies in low-income settings.",
author = "M. Cardona and R. Joshi",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09581590601045238",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "81--89",
journal = "Critical Public Health",
issn = "0958-1596",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The challenge of balancing methodological research rigour and practical needs in low-income setttings : What we are doing and what we need to do better. / Cardona, M.; Joshi, R.

In: Critical Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.03.2007, p. 81-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenge of balancing methodological research rigour and practical needs in low-income setttings

T2 - What we are doing and what we need to do better

AU - Cardona, M.

AU - Joshi, R.

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - A roundtable discussion was held with 29 experienced Public Health researchers and policy makers from 9 countries at an international conference in Australia. Their experiences were discussed about establishing and maintaining research projects and health programs in developing countries. This paper aims to (1) Highlight methodological issues relevant to the conduct of research and development in low income settings as discussed at the roundtable; (2) List the main barriers in implementing research and project initiatives in low-income settings; and (3) present recommendations for meeting researchers' needs across cultures without jeopardising methodological rigour. Lessons learnt on barriers for the conduct of methodologically sound research were classified in four domains: investigator factors, community factors, strategic factors and methodological factors. Proposed solutions emerged in the areas of strategic guidelines, attitudinal changes and methodological approaches. Practical solutions to individual and systematic barriers were also suggested. It is hoped that these recommendations will influence current practice and assist other researchers in preparing and undertaking appropriate research methods and health program delivery strategies in low-income settings.

AB - A roundtable discussion was held with 29 experienced Public Health researchers and policy makers from 9 countries at an international conference in Australia. Their experiences were discussed about establishing and maintaining research projects and health programs in developing countries. This paper aims to (1) Highlight methodological issues relevant to the conduct of research and development in low income settings as discussed at the roundtable; (2) List the main barriers in implementing research and project initiatives in low-income settings; and (3) present recommendations for meeting researchers' needs across cultures without jeopardising methodological rigour. Lessons learnt on barriers for the conduct of methodologically sound research were classified in four domains: investigator factors, community factors, strategic factors and methodological factors. Proposed solutions emerged in the areas of strategic guidelines, attitudinal changes and methodological approaches. Practical solutions to individual and systematic barriers were also suggested. It is hoped that these recommendations will influence current practice and assist other researchers in preparing and undertaking appropriate research methods and health program delivery strategies in low-income settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947364805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09581590601045238

DO - 10.1080/09581590601045238

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 81

EP - 89

JO - Critical Public Health

JF - Critical Public Health

SN - 0958-1596

IS - 1

ER -