The central role of party self-determination in mediation ethics

Research output: Contribution to journalOnline ResourceProfessional

Abstract

[Extract]
The dominant paradigm of mediation ethics has traditionally given a central role to the notion of mediator neutrality. However, this focus has been criticised in recent decades for being unrealistic and overlooking the power dynamics between the parties. In our forthcoming book, Mediation Ethics: From Theory to Practice, we advocate a new paradigm of mediation ethics focused on the notion of party self-determination. Why, then, is party self-determination a suitable candidate for this role?

The justification for making party self-determination the primary ethical imperative of mediation centres on two main arguments. The first argument is that the possibility of achieving self-determination for the parties is what distinguishes mediation from other dispute resolution processes and makes it a distinct and valuable process in its own right. The second argument is that the achievement of party self-determination provides a principled foundation for the legitimacy of the mediation process. We discuss these arguments briefly below
Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Dispute Resolution Research Network Blog
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The central role of party self-determination in mediation ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this