The Canadian C-Spine Rule

Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto, Zoe A. Michaleff

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Description: The Canadian C-Spine Rule was designed in 2001 to assist clinicians assess the need for imaging in people who present to the emergency department with a cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. Specifically, this clinical decision rule was developed for use in adults who are alert (score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale), stable and in whom a clinically important cervical spine injury is a concern (eg, unstable fracture, dislocation). Instructions and scoring: The Canadian C-Spine Rule is based on three high-risk criteria (age ≥ 65 years, dangerous injury mechanism, paresthesia in extremities), five low-risk criteria (simple rear-end motor vehicle collision, sitting position in the emergency department, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain; absence of midline cervical-spine tenderness), and the ability of the person to rotate their neck. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change: The Canadian C-Spine Rule has good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability when applied by physicians (kappa = 0.63), nurses (kappa = 0.80) and paramedics (kappa = 0.93). The sensitivity of the Canadian C-Spine Rule has been reported to range from 90 to 100%, whereas specificity has ranged from 1 to 77%. The large range in specificity reflects the heterogeneity between studies in the number of people who unnecessarily receive imaging (ie, people who do not have a serious cervical spine injury but are still referred for imaging). However, the rule itself errs on the side of caution, as clinicians will not miss a clinically important cervical spine injury. In the only direct comparison, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was found to have better diagnostic accuracy than the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, which form another widely used clinical decision rule.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Physiotherapy
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Hospital Emergency Service
Allied Health Personnel
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Glasgow Coma Scale
Neck Pain
Paresthesia
Motor Vehicles
Posture
Reproducibility of Results
Radiography
Emergencies
Neck
Extremities
Nurses
Physicians

Cite this

Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti ; Michaleff, Zoe A. / The Canadian C-Spine Rule. In: Journal of Physiotherapy. 2016 ; Vol. 62, No. 3. pp. 170.
@article{0d2ac51281d04d5baf96e9aa7ac95d01,
title = "The Canadian C-Spine Rule",
abstract = "Description: The Canadian C-Spine Rule was designed in 2001 to assist clinicians assess the need for imaging in people who present to the emergency department with a cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. Specifically, this clinical decision rule was developed for use in adults who are alert (score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale), stable and in whom a clinically important cervical spine injury is a concern (eg, unstable fracture, dislocation). Instructions and scoring: The Canadian C-Spine Rule is based on three high-risk criteria (age ≥ 65 years, dangerous injury mechanism, paresthesia in extremities), five low-risk criteria (simple rear-end motor vehicle collision, sitting position in the emergency department, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain; absence of midline cervical-spine tenderness), and the ability of the person to rotate their neck. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change: The Canadian C-Spine Rule has good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability when applied by physicians (kappa = 0.63), nurses (kappa = 0.80) and paramedics (kappa = 0.93). The sensitivity of the Canadian C-Spine Rule has been reported to range from 90 to 100{\%}, whereas specificity has ranged from 1 to 77{\%}. The large range in specificity reflects the heterogeneity between studies in the number of people who unnecessarily receive imaging (ie, people who do not have a serious cervical spine injury but are still referred for imaging). However, the rule itself errs on the side of caution, as clinicians will not miss a clinically important cervical spine injury. In the only direct comparison, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was found to have better diagnostic accuracy than the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, which form another widely used clinical decision rule.",
author = "Saragiotto, {Bruno Tirotti} and Michaleff, {Zoe A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jphys.2016.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "170",
journal = "Australian Journal of Physiotherapy",
issn = "0004-9514",
publisher = "Australian Physiotherapy Association",
number = "3",

}

The Canadian C-Spine Rule. / Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti; Michaleff, Zoe A.

In: Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 62, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 170.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Canadian C-Spine Rule

AU - Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti

AU - Michaleff, Zoe A.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Description: The Canadian C-Spine Rule was designed in 2001 to assist clinicians assess the need for imaging in people who present to the emergency department with a cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. Specifically, this clinical decision rule was developed for use in adults who are alert (score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale), stable and in whom a clinically important cervical spine injury is a concern (eg, unstable fracture, dislocation). Instructions and scoring: The Canadian C-Spine Rule is based on three high-risk criteria (age ≥ 65 years, dangerous injury mechanism, paresthesia in extremities), five low-risk criteria (simple rear-end motor vehicle collision, sitting position in the emergency department, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain; absence of midline cervical-spine tenderness), and the ability of the person to rotate their neck. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change: The Canadian C-Spine Rule has good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability when applied by physicians (kappa = 0.63), nurses (kappa = 0.80) and paramedics (kappa = 0.93). The sensitivity of the Canadian C-Spine Rule has been reported to range from 90 to 100%, whereas specificity has ranged from 1 to 77%. The large range in specificity reflects the heterogeneity between studies in the number of people who unnecessarily receive imaging (ie, people who do not have a serious cervical spine injury but are still referred for imaging). However, the rule itself errs on the side of caution, as clinicians will not miss a clinically important cervical spine injury. In the only direct comparison, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was found to have better diagnostic accuracy than the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, which form another widely used clinical decision rule.

AB - Description: The Canadian C-Spine Rule was designed in 2001 to assist clinicians assess the need for imaging in people who present to the emergency department with a cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. Specifically, this clinical decision rule was developed for use in adults who are alert (score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale), stable and in whom a clinically important cervical spine injury is a concern (eg, unstable fracture, dislocation). Instructions and scoring: The Canadian C-Spine Rule is based on three high-risk criteria (age ≥ 65 years, dangerous injury mechanism, paresthesia in extremities), five low-risk criteria (simple rear-end motor vehicle collision, sitting position in the emergency department, ambulatory at any time, delayed onset of neck pain; absence of midline cervical-spine tenderness), and the ability of the person to rotate their neck. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change: The Canadian C-Spine Rule has good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability when applied by physicians (kappa = 0.63), nurses (kappa = 0.80) and paramedics (kappa = 0.93). The sensitivity of the Canadian C-Spine Rule has been reported to range from 90 to 100%, whereas specificity has ranged from 1 to 77%. The large range in specificity reflects the heterogeneity between studies in the number of people who unnecessarily receive imaging (ie, people who do not have a serious cervical spine injury but are still referred for imaging). However, the rule itself errs on the side of caution, as clinicians will not miss a clinically important cervical spine injury. In the only direct comparison, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was found to have better diagnostic accuracy than the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria, which form another widely used clinical decision rule.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964921030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.04.001

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 62

SP - 170

JO - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

SN - 0004-9514

IS - 3

ER -