The Buddy Study: Local reach, adoption and implementation following a randomised controlled trial of conservative management of fifth metacarpal neck fractures

Charlotte Alexander, Eve Purdy, Aoife Reynolds, Luc Nguyen, Richard Pellatt, Gerben B.J.M. Keijzers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective:
To understand the reach, adoption and implementation of the evidence that buddy strapping for uncomplicated fifth metacarpal neck fractures is non-inferior to plaster casting.

Methods:
Mixed-method study using clinical audit of the years before and after the original randomised controlled study was published (2019) and staff questionnaires/semi-structured interviews.

Results:
Sixty-nine percent of questionnaire respondents were aware of the original study findings (i.e. reach) and 57% had adopted the research findings. The proportion of patients receiving buddy strapping was 6% in 2014-2016 and 28% in 2019-2021 (implementation). Qualitative data provided insight into ongoing barriers to adoption and implementation including fear of reprisal, the need for permission, opinions of senior decision makers, perceptions about patient preferences, and an overall tendency to 'play it safe'.

Conclusions:
Even in a department where primary research is conducted, implementation requires ongoing attention to factors impacting reach and adoption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)672-675
Number of pages4
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume36
Issue number5
Early online date16 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Buddy Study: Local reach, adoption and implementation following a randomised controlled trial of conservative management of fifth metacarpal neck fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this