The blindness of the eye-witness

Ian R. Coyle, David Field, Glen Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A criminal trial is an attempt to recreate the past. It involves the presentation of physical evidence and eyewitness evidence. The scientific model has long been accepted in the presentation of physical evidence but not with eyewitness evidence. Although the courts have long recognised the potential for prejudice that can arise at each stage of the process of eyewitness identification, attempts to remedy this problem have been largely limited to giving judicial warnings and instructing jurors to apply their common sense and human experience. Yet, there are many occasions where common sense fails and there are many occasions where the results of eyewitness identification are counter-intuitive. All too often this has led to grave miscarriages of justice as, whatever warnings are given to a jury, the danger of misidentification remains. The time has come for the superior courts to revisit and carefully examine the very tenuous basis upon which expert evidence is rejected in cases where eyewitness identification is involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-498
Number of pages28
JournalAustralian Law Journal
Volume82
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

blindness
witness
evidence
prejudice
remedies
justice
expert
experience

Cite this

Coyle, I. R., Field, D., & Miller, G. (2008). The blindness of the eye-witness. Australian Law Journal, 82(7), 471-498.
Coyle, Ian R. ; Field, David ; Miller, Glen. / The blindness of the eye-witness. In: Australian Law Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 82, No. 7. pp. 471-498.
@article{dc6c90890c7b4376bce28c8b02c5f07c,
title = "The blindness of the eye-witness",
abstract = "A criminal trial is an attempt to recreate the past. It involves the presentation of physical evidence and eyewitness evidence. The scientific model has long been accepted in the presentation of physical evidence but not with eyewitness evidence. Although the courts have long recognised the potential for prejudice that can arise at each stage of the process of eyewitness identification, attempts to remedy this problem have been largely limited to giving judicial warnings and instructing jurors to apply their common sense and human experience. Yet, there are many occasions where common sense fails and there are many occasions where the results of eyewitness identification are counter-intuitive. All too often this has led to grave miscarriages of justice as, whatever warnings are given to a jury, the danger of misidentification remains. The time has come for the superior courts to revisit and carefully examine the very tenuous basis upon which expert evidence is rejected in cases where eyewitness identification is involved.",
author = "Coyle, {Ian R.} and David Field and Glen Miller",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "471--498",
journal = "Australian Law Journal",
issn = "0004-9611",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "7",

}

Coyle, IR, Field, D & Miller, G 2008, 'The blindness of the eye-witness' Australian Law Journal, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 471-498.

The blindness of the eye-witness. / Coyle, Ian R.; Field, David; Miller, Glen.

In: Australian Law Journal, Vol. 82, No. 7, 2008, p. 471-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The blindness of the eye-witness

AU - Coyle, Ian R.

AU - Field, David

AU - Miller, Glen

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A criminal trial is an attempt to recreate the past. It involves the presentation of physical evidence and eyewitness evidence. The scientific model has long been accepted in the presentation of physical evidence but not with eyewitness evidence. Although the courts have long recognised the potential for prejudice that can arise at each stage of the process of eyewitness identification, attempts to remedy this problem have been largely limited to giving judicial warnings and instructing jurors to apply their common sense and human experience. Yet, there are many occasions where common sense fails and there are many occasions where the results of eyewitness identification are counter-intuitive. All too often this has led to grave miscarriages of justice as, whatever warnings are given to a jury, the danger of misidentification remains. The time has come for the superior courts to revisit and carefully examine the very tenuous basis upon which expert evidence is rejected in cases where eyewitness identification is involved.

AB - A criminal trial is an attempt to recreate the past. It involves the presentation of physical evidence and eyewitness evidence. The scientific model has long been accepted in the presentation of physical evidence but not with eyewitness evidence. Although the courts have long recognised the potential for prejudice that can arise at each stage of the process of eyewitness identification, attempts to remedy this problem have been largely limited to giving judicial warnings and instructing jurors to apply their common sense and human experience. Yet, there are many occasions where common sense fails and there are many occasions where the results of eyewitness identification are counter-intuitive. All too often this has led to grave miscarriages of justice as, whatever warnings are given to a jury, the danger of misidentification remains. The time has come for the superior courts to revisit and carefully examine the very tenuous basis upon which expert evidence is rejected in cases where eyewitness identification is involved.

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 471

EP - 498

JO - Australian Law Journal

JF - Australian Law Journal

SN - 0004-9611

IS - 7

ER -

Coyle IR, Field D, Miller G. The blindness of the eye-witness. Australian Law Journal. 2008;82(7):471-498.