The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students

Justine L. Ebenreuter, Richard E. Hicks

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which the Five-Factor model of personality was useful for the assessment of leadership styles of university students. To do this, three specific leadership styles were assessed: Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-faire Leadership. Due to an increase in the understanding of the elements which constitute leadership, researchers have asked, given the contingencies and employment demands leaders typically face, whether different styles of leadership are effective in different circumstances and by implication whether different personality attributes are related to these styles (Bass et al., 1994). This query has resulted in a significant amount of research into the fundamental impact of leadership on institutional performance (Guastello, 1998). This paper examines the Big Five factors in relation to the early stages in the development of the three leadership styles and relates these findings to personality attributes of mostly older adults who have developed their leadership styles in the workplace. This paper answers the question: Are the same personality attributes related in the same way to different leadership styles among university students as exist among adults in the workforce? Eighty-seven first year University students (72 females and 15 males, mean age 25.1) recruited from a private Australian University, completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the International Personality Item Pool Questionnaire and a survey on students' opportunities to lead. For data analysis, a hierarchical regression analysis was employed. It was hypothesised that Transformational Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Extraversion and Openness to Experience; Transactional Leadership and Laissez-faire Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Conscientiousness and Agreeableness; and none of the active leadership styles would be related to the Neuroticism personality variable. These hypotheses were supported except for Agreeableness, which was not related to any of the leadership styles.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPersonality Down Under
Subtitle of host publicationPerspectives from Australia
EditorsS. Boag
PublisherNova Science Publishers
Pages155-164
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9781604567946
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

leadership
university
student
personality
personality traits
neuroticism
questionnaire
female student
contingency
regression analysis
data analysis
workplace
leader

Cite this

Ebenreuter, J. L., & Hicks, R. E. (2008). The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students. In S. Boag (Ed.), Personality Down Under: Perspectives from Australia (pp. 155-164). Nova Science Publishers.
Ebenreuter, Justine L. ; Hicks, Richard E. / The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students. Personality Down Under: Perspectives from Australia. editor / S. Boag. Nova Science Publishers, 2008. pp. 155-164
@inbook{e47504a09f9542f8a891d5189b2b176b,
title = "The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which the Five-Factor model of personality was useful for the assessment of leadership styles of university students. To do this, three specific leadership styles were assessed: Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-faire Leadership. Due to an increase in the understanding of the elements which constitute leadership, researchers have asked, given the contingencies and employment demands leaders typically face, whether different styles of leadership are effective in different circumstances and by implication whether different personality attributes are related to these styles (Bass et al., 1994). This query has resulted in a significant amount of research into the fundamental impact of leadership on institutional performance (Guastello, 1998). This paper examines the Big Five factors in relation to the early stages in the development of the three leadership styles and relates these findings to personality attributes of mostly older adults who have developed their leadership styles in the workplace. This paper answers the question: Are the same personality attributes related in the same way to different leadership styles among university students as exist among adults in the workforce? Eighty-seven first year University students (72 females and 15 males, mean age 25.1) recruited from a private Australian University, completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the International Personality Item Pool Questionnaire and a survey on students' opportunities to lead. For data analysis, a hierarchical regression analysis was employed. It was hypothesised that Transformational Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Extraversion and Openness to Experience; Transactional Leadership and Laissez-faire Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Conscientiousness and Agreeableness; and none of the active leadership styles would be related to the Neuroticism personality variable. These hypotheses were supported except for Agreeableness, which was not related to any of the leadership styles.",
author = "Ebenreuter, {Justine L.} and Hicks, {Richard E.}",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781604567946",
pages = "155--164",
editor = "S. Boag",
booktitle = "Personality Down Under",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers",

}

Ebenreuter, JL & Hicks, RE 2008, The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students. in S Boag (ed.), Personality Down Under: Perspectives from Australia. Nova Science Publishers, pp. 155-164.

The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students. / Ebenreuter, Justine L.; Hicks, Richard E.

Personality Down Under: Perspectives from Australia. ed. / S. Boag. Nova Science Publishers, 2008. p. 155-164.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students

AU - Ebenreuter, Justine L.

AU - Hicks, Richard E.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which the Five-Factor model of personality was useful for the assessment of leadership styles of university students. To do this, three specific leadership styles were assessed: Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-faire Leadership. Due to an increase in the understanding of the elements which constitute leadership, researchers have asked, given the contingencies and employment demands leaders typically face, whether different styles of leadership are effective in different circumstances and by implication whether different personality attributes are related to these styles (Bass et al., 1994). This query has resulted in a significant amount of research into the fundamental impact of leadership on institutional performance (Guastello, 1998). This paper examines the Big Five factors in relation to the early stages in the development of the three leadership styles and relates these findings to personality attributes of mostly older adults who have developed their leadership styles in the workplace. This paper answers the question: Are the same personality attributes related in the same way to different leadership styles among university students as exist among adults in the workforce? Eighty-seven first year University students (72 females and 15 males, mean age 25.1) recruited from a private Australian University, completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the International Personality Item Pool Questionnaire and a survey on students' opportunities to lead. For data analysis, a hierarchical regression analysis was employed. It was hypothesised that Transformational Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Extraversion and Openness to Experience; Transactional Leadership and Laissez-faire Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Conscientiousness and Agreeableness; and none of the active leadership styles would be related to the Neuroticism personality variable. These hypotheses were supported except for Agreeableness, which was not related to any of the leadership styles.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which the Five-Factor model of personality was useful for the assessment of leadership styles of university students. To do this, three specific leadership styles were assessed: Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-faire Leadership. Due to an increase in the understanding of the elements which constitute leadership, researchers have asked, given the contingencies and employment demands leaders typically face, whether different styles of leadership are effective in different circumstances and by implication whether different personality attributes are related to these styles (Bass et al., 1994). This query has resulted in a significant amount of research into the fundamental impact of leadership on institutional performance (Guastello, 1998). This paper examines the Big Five factors in relation to the early stages in the development of the three leadership styles and relates these findings to personality attributes of mostly older adults who have developed their leadership styles in the workplace. This paper answers the question: Are the same personality attributes related in the same way to different leadership styles among university students as exist among adults in the workforce? Eighty-seven first year University students (72 females and 15 males, mean age 25.1) recruited from a private Australian University, completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the International Personality Item Pool Questionnaire and a survey on students' opportunities to lead. For data analysis, a hierarchical regression analysis was employed. It was hypothesised that Transformational Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Extraversion and Openness to Experience; Transactional Leadership and Laissez-faire Leadership would be related directly to the personality traits Conscientiousness and Agreeableness; and none of the active leadership styles would be related to the Neuroticism personality variable. These hypotheses were supported except for Agreeableness, which was not related to any of the leadership styles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892123569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=7470

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781604567946

SP - 155

EP - 164

BT - Personality Down Under

A2 - Boag, S.

PB - Nova Science Publishers

ER -

Ebenreuter JL, Hicks RE. The big five in predicting leadership styles of university students. In Boag S, editor, Personality Down Under: Perspectives from Australia. Nova Science Publishers. 2008. p. 155-164