The application of an action system model to destructive behaviour: The examples of arson and terrorism

Katarina Fritzon, David Canter, Zoe Wilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that criminal and deviant behaviour can be productively viewed through an action system framework. The idea is developed by considering two forms of destructive behaviour: Arson and barricade-hostage terrorist incidents. Two studies are presented. The first study tests the hypothesis that different forms of arson will reflect the four dominant states that an action system can take; integrative, expressive, conservative, and adaptive. A smallest space analysis was performed on 46 variables describing 230 cases of arson and the results identified the four themes of action system functioning. An examination of the personal characteristics of the arsonists also produced four variable groupings and a combined analysis of the four action scales and four characteristics scales also supported the structural hypothesis of the action system model. The second study applied the action system model to the study acts of terrorist barricade-hostage incidents. A smallest space analysis of 44 variables coded from 41 incidents again revealed four distinct forms of activity, which were psychologically similar to the four modes of arson identified in study one. Overall, these two studies provide support for the appropriateness of the action system framework as a way of classifying different forms of deviant behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-690
Number of pages34
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume19
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Firesetting Behavior
Terrorism
system model
terrorism
incident
deviant behavior
Prisoners
system of action
criminality
grouping
examination

Cite this

@article{e8db8eab8300481288c1cfad55b182a2,
title = "The application of an action system model to destructive behaviour: The examples of arson and terrorism",
abstract = "This article argues that criminal and deviant behaviour can be productively viewed through an action system framework. The idea is developed by considering two forms of destructive behaviour: Arson and barricade-hostage terrorist incidents. Two studies are presented. The first study tests the hypothesis that different forms of arson will reflect the four dominant states that an action system can take; integrative, expressive, conservative, and adaptive. A smallest space analysis was performed on 46 variables describing 230 cases of arson and the results identified the four themes of action system functioning. An examination of the personal characteristics of the arsonists also produced four variable groupings and a combined analysis of the four action scales and four characteristics scales also supported the structural hypothesis of the action system model. The second study applied the action system model to the study acts of terrorist barricade-hostage incidents. A smallest space analysis of 44 variables coded from 41 incidents again revealed four distinct forms of activity, which were psychologically similar to the four modes of arson identified in study one. Overall, these two studies provide support for the appropriateness of the action system framework as a way of classifying different forms of deviant behaviour.",
author = "Katarina Fritzon and David Canter and Zoe Wilton",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.464",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "657--690",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5-6",

}

The application of an action system model to destructive behaviour : The examples of arson and terrorism. / Fritzon, Katarina; Canter, David; Wilton, Zoe.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 19, No. 5-6, 2001, p. 657-690.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The application of an action system model to destructive behaviour

T2 - The examples of arson and terrorism

AU - Fritzon, Katarina

AU - Canter, David

AU - Wilton, Zoe

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This article argues that criminal and deviant behaviour can be productively viewed through an action system framework. The idea is developed by considering two forms of destructive behaviour: Arson and barricade-hostage terrorist incidents. Two studies are presented. The first study tests the hypothesis that different forms of arson will reflect the four dominant states that an action system can take; integrative, expressive, conservative, and adaptive. A smallest space analysis was performed on 46 variables describing 230 cases of arson and the results identified the four themes of action system functioning. An examination of the personal characteristics of the arsonists also produced four variable groupings and a combined analysis of the four action scales and four characteristics scales also supported the structural hypothesis of the action system model. The second study applied the action system model to the study acts of terrorist barricade-hostage incidents. A smallest space analysis of 44 variables coded from 41 incidents again revealed four distinct forms of activity, which were psychologically similar to the four modes of arson identified in study one. Overall, these two studies provide support for the appropriateness of the action system framework as a way of classifying different forms of deviant behaviour.

AB - This article argues that criminal and deviant behaviour can be productively viewed through an action system framework. The idea is developed by considering two forms of destructive behaviour: Arson and barricade-hostage terrorist incidents. Two studies are presented. The first study tests the hypothesis that different forms of arson will reflect the four dominant states that an action system can take; integrative, expressive, conservative, and adaptive. A smallest space analysis was performed on 46 variables describing 230 cases of arson and the results identified the four themes of action system functioning. An examination of the personal characteristics of the arsonists also produced four variable groupings and a combined analysis of the four action scales and four characteristics scales also supported the structural hypothesis of the action system model. The second study applied the action system model to the study acts of terrorist barricade-hostage incidents. A smallest space analysis of 44 variables coded from 41 incidents again revealed four distinct forms of activity, which were psychologically similar to the four modes of arson identified in study one. Overall, these two studies provide support for the appropriateness of the action system framework as a way of classifying different forms of deviant behaviour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035700262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.464

DO - 10.1002/bsl.464

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 657

EP - 690

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 5-6

ER -